• 20Jul

    Microsoft Xbox is at the moment very focused on reigniting stagnating sales of Xbox 360 consoles and elongating the 360’s lifespan. It is pursuing a two part strategy to accomplishing this; 1) launching an updated Xbox 360 “Slim” console, and 2) expanding the Xbox footprint by focusing on the “social gamer” segment with its controller free motion capture platform Kinect for Xbox 360. 

    Early sale trends from the US and
    UK markets suggest that the new Xbox 360 Slim has indeed accelerated console sales and now Xbox is turning its attention to the second part of the strategy – expanding its footprint into the social gamer segment. As we wrote in our recent
    report on Kinect, we believe that one of the key factors that will make or break Kinect will be if Xbox can get the pricing and bundle strategy correct for the price sensitive social gamer segment. We suggested at the time that Xbox need to have an entry level bundle (e.g. Xbox Arcade, Kinect, Dance Central game) starting at below $300 to succeed in breaking into this segment.

    Well it seems as Xbox may have listened to us as they today officially announced an estimated retail price (ERP) bundle of $299 (€299/£249) for an entry level Xbox console which will come with 4GB storage (compared to the current 256MB Arcade version), Kinect hardware and the “Kinect Adventures” game.

    The standalone Kinect hardware will get an ERP of $149 (€149/£129) as has been widely rumored for some time. While we think this latter price point is likely too high to entice most existing Xbox owners to upgrade to the Kinect platform, we believe it makes sense for Xbox to focus on the entry bundles for now, in order to accelerate console sales, and keep the standalone Kinect price high until a larger catalog of Kinect games has been launched.

    All in all, we think Xbox has skilfully negotiated the first major hurdle for Kinect – getting the price point for an attractive bundle correct. It now needs to focus on getting third party developers to embrace the Kinect platform and quickly build up an attractive catalogue of Kinect compatible games. 

    Martin Olausson

    Posted by Martin Olausson @ 5:32 pm

  • 30Jun


    Two months ago, when the Hulu Plus rumor came out in the industry, we did a comparison between between Netflix and Hulu Plus here. Now that Hulu Plus is officially introduced, let’s take a further look at the new service.

    According to Hulu, Hulu Plus is not a replacement for Hulu.com. Hulu Plus is a new, revolutionary ad-supported subscription product that is incremental and complementary to the existing Hulu service. For almost all of the current broadcast shows on our service, Hulu Plus offers the full season. Every single episode of the current season will be available, not just a handful of trailing episodes. Moreover, Hulu Plus subscribers can now watch their favorites through more than just the browser on their Mac or PC. Hulu Plus subscribers will be able to watch all the Hulu shows on Internet connected TVs, iPhones, iPads and game consoles.

    In short, Hulu Plus offers a deep catalogue of TV shows and a wide range of content distribution channels. It is the TV Everywhere by broadcasters.

    So will consumers be willing to pay for the service? Without statistical evidence yet, a qualitative comparison among online premium video offerings could shed some light on the future of Hulu Plus. Netflix is a similar service which we’ve already compared with Hulu Plus in the previous post. As Hulu Plus has made it universally accessible, Netflix on iPhone is also coming soon. Both services are going the video everywhere approach. From the content distribution portfolio perspective, Hulu Plus is on par with Netflix streaming service. With $1 price advantage, Netflix could gain a slight edge over Hulu Plus, although a minor one. The key difference between the two services come down to content selection. While Netflix is a back-catalogue movie service, Hulu Plus is a back-catalogue TV show service, as all consumers can watch recent TV shows on regular Hulu service. So the competition could be somewhat simplified to TV shows VS movies. Netflix again has an edge over Hulu, with some of the TV shows such as Lost, 24 and Prison Break, also being included in its catalogue. Going forward, Hulu Plus could grow its catalogue significantly, but Netflix’s big user base makes it hard for broadcasters to ignore and not to sign deals with.

    Cable companies’ TV Everywhere is definitely a competing service to Hulu Plus. With similar content distribution portfolio in which users can access content on TVs, PCs and mobile phones, TV Everywhere could have better content selection than Hulu Plus. And for current cable subscribers, there is no incremental expense to enjoy TV Everywhere programs. But the speed of rolling out TV Everywhere service is questionable so far.

    Hulu Plus is clearly an experiment by the broadcasters in the hope of generating revenues by distributing content on their own. If Hulu Plus could prove its viability on profitability, there will be more content providers joining the game. And cable companies would inevitably lose their leverage in the negotiation. It is foreseeable that Hulu Plus could potentially become a formidable over-the-top TV service provider that rivals Comcast and Time Warner Cable, once all the major content providers join Hulu Plus. This could lead to the failure of cable companies’ TV Everywhere and eventually the distinction of cable companies. But right now it is still too early to tell.

    -Jia Wu

    Posted by Jia Wu @ 10:13 pm

  • 16Apr

    Google Logo
    Yesterday, Google reported its earning for the first quarter of 2010. Its revenue for the quarter was up 23% compared to the same period last year, with total advertising revenue increasing by 21%. Google’s US revenue grew by 22%, slightly lower than its overall growth rate. This is clearly a robust performance delivered by Google. In the meantime, comScore released US Search Engine ranking for March 2010 four days ago, indicating a 65.1% search market share from Google in the US, which was only up 1.4% comparing to the same quarter 2009.

    It is reasonable to assume that the revenue share in the search market is somewhat proportionate to search traffic share, although different search engines could have different cost-per-click and other factors. Surprisingly, we see that now Google’s 1.4% increase in the US traffic share has led to a 22% growth in revenue. It isn’t that proportionate, is it? Well, it’s still proportionate as the overall search market or online advertising market is bouncing back. We’ve already seen a strong fourth quarter rebound in 2009 in the online ad market mainly owing to the holiday season. Now Google’s strong performance has shown that the search ad market is back to rapid growth track. In light of Google’s performance, we anticipate that Yahoo!, Microsoft, Ask and AOL will all see their search revenues expanding in Q1 2010.

    Interesting, Google’s stock was trading down massively for 5% after Google’s strong earning release. Some analysis say the stock price decline attributes to Google’s increasing cost on R&D and hiring, but I’d rather believe that investors’s expectations on Google was just too high. They wanted even better results than this impressive one. With all the huge investment in innovation, Google is now under pressure to deliver the results of those innovation faster.

    Jia Wu
    Client Reading: Digital Media Index (DMI): Q4 2009

    Posted by Jia Wu @ 4:39 pm

  • 18Nov

    Fala sério!  (“Talk seriously!,” “You must be kidding!”) is likely one of the only remnants of my two semesters of university Brazilian Portuguese—well, that and the ability to sing “Happy Birthday.”  Nonetheless, nobody in that classroom years ago would have believed that major companies, namely Vivendi and Telefónica, would one day be fighting for ownership of a Brazilian Telco

    In an escalating price war that has repercussions on three continents, French media giant Vivendi and Spanish Telco Telefónica have been bidding up Brazilian operator GVT–the country’s fourth-largest high-speed Internet provider.  In a somewhat surprising move, Vivendi bought out 37.9% of GVT with the option of buying another 19.6% so it can have total control of the broadband telco.  The price tag?  A cool $4.2 billion.  Telefónica sources said the Spanish telco will not pursue any further counteroffers.

    The move is noteworthy for a few reasons:

    It underlines the strategic  importance of Brazil as an emerging market

    In a report we published recently, we talk about the importance of Brazil as an emerging powerhouse.  Our base case model predicts broadband subscriptions growing to nearly 20 million by 2013, implying a 15% CAGR.  Broadband sub and revenue growth is largely predicated on increasing importance of IP-delivered video content, as well as the expected surge in IPTV providers in the Latin American region.  By hitching its wagon to an established player at this point in the game, Vivendi has the opportunity to establish a beachhead in a key emerging market–one whose tv market is expected to grow faster than Western Europe.

    It’s a direct challenge to Telefónica in its “home turf”

    Telefónica, through its Telesp subsidiary , has enjoyed a nice piece of the Brazilian fixed broadband market–market share is estimated to be around 28%. Vivendi’s takeover of GVT challenges Telefónica’s position in the Sao Paolo market, puts it on the defensive, and further limits its ability to expand outside of the Sao Paolo metro area.

    It further paves the way for an eventual Comcast NBCU merger

    Vivendi’s move is a clear and final signal that the company is ready to sell its 20% ownership of NBCU, valued at approximately $6 billion.  Indeed, it will need to in order to finance the GVT purchase.   This freeing up of ownership will pave the way for an eventual takeover of NBC Universal by Comcast.

    I expect we’ll be seeing more of this type of emerging market “pre-positioning” going on the next few years.

    Posted by bpiper @ 9:17 pm

  • 11Sep

    Just arrived in Amsterdam for this year’s IBC. Doors open in a couple of hours and then it’s straight into press conferences and company briefings.

    Key themes this year will obviously be 3D. After the hype generated at IFA in Berlin last week for consumer 3D devices it will be interesting to see whether the broadcasters and service providers are gearing up to support the desperate need for 3D content. One thing seems clear – Disney movies alone will not be enough to sustain a home 3D market.
    We expect to see many examples of 3D user interfaces and guides – this is one of the major challenges if the TV industry is to transition even partially to 3D delivery over the coming years.

    Other technology trends in the professional space will be the continued penetration of HD in the production and distribution chain; the related trend towards 3Gig capability in the workflow, which is required to support future moves towards 1080p broadcasting; and trends in camcorder formats, or the decline of the format as it could be described.

    In general it will be good to test the mood of the industry after a period of severe downturn. During the last IBC http://www.strategyanalytics.com/blogs/326/ a year ago the financial world was entering crisis mode as Lehman Brothers collapsed, and shortly after the show many purchase orders were put on hold or abandoned. While the worst may now be over, the industry is still reeling from this blow and will take some time to recover. It will be surprising if the show floors are not easier to negotiate this year.

    Join Strategy Analytics and D. I. S. Consulting at IBC: Complimentary Analyst Presentations

    Client Reading: US IPTV Market Sizing: 15.5 Million Subscribers by 2013

    Add to Technorati Favorites

    Posted by David Mercer @ 8:38 am

  • 06Jul

    Phone Reverse Tracking

    Posted by admin @ 12:39 am

  • 06Jul

    Reverse Phone Tracking
    0×80070005 192.168.1.1

    Posted by admin @ 12:32 am

  • 21Nov

    …On Strategy Analytics’ target, that is. We predicted global 2008 sales of 4.0 million units back in March, and that still seems a reasonable estimate. Some major industry players, however, seem to have been too optimistic and are now scaling back their plans. Sigma Designs is one of the leading suppliers of video processors for Blu-ray players. Sigma’s Edward McGregor has been quoted as saying: “Blu-ray has been slower than expected to catch on”, partly in defence of his company’s loss of market share to rivals Broadcom, NEC and others. It seems Sigma had been working on predictions of up to 6 million units and has now reduced these to 3-4 million.

    Companies often use this excuse, and take market projections that suit their needs at any given time. It’s an inevitable part of the forecasting game.

    That’s not to say we always get it right. As I’ve said previously forecasts are very rarely precisely accurate. But it is important to set a broadly correct expectation, and I would dispute that Blu-ray is not performing to expectations, as Sigma and many others now seem to be suggesting.

    As I’ve highlighted many times, just because Blu-ray defeated HD-DVD didn’t mean it was going to replace DVD overnight. It was always going to be a long haul for Blu-ray, and the dive in consumer confidence (the scale of which very few predicted a few months ago) is clearly not going to help in the near term.

    But while this holiday period is important for Blu-ray it’s by no means critical in the long term. This is a five-year transition and we are only in the very early stages.

    Client Reading: Blu-ray Disc Devices: Global Market Forecast

    Add to Technorati Favorites

    Posted by David Mercer @ 11:37 am

  • 26Jun

    Social network services have boomed in the last couple of years, led by now well-known brands such as Facebook, Myspace and Bebo. I profess to finding the whole thing a little bemusing, but that’s doubtless down to my unsuitable demographic. Perhaps if I’d been born 20 years later I’d now be spending hours every day updating my social pages and checking out the latest activities of “friends” I never thought I had or needed.

    Strategy Analytics’ own survey data confirms that I’m in the wrong age group to appreciate the value of these services. Of online users across the US and Europe, 63% of 15-24 year-olds and 52% of 25-34s use a social network. Once we reach middle age the proportion drops below a third: 30% of 35-44s and 25% of 45-54s. Only 15% of those lucky enough to have reached or be approaching retirement (55 and over) have discovered the delights of MySpace and Facebook.

    In actual fact, as an occasional user of Linked-in I do classify as a “user”. I did also register with Facebook and receive invitations to “connect” from “friends” I have never heard of. I suppose grumpy old men just aren’t cut out for all this friendship. It’s good to know today’s youngsters have so many options ahead of them…

    Other findings from our study: UK internauts are most likely to maintain a social network, with just over half claiming to be users. The proportion in the US is 44%, and 37% in Italy, but in France and Germany only just over 20% of internet users are networking socially.

    Our findings suggest that social networks are attracting huge daily audiences. In the US more than 30 million people are using a service every day, while in the UK the number is more than 8 million. That’s a lot of young people being pulled away from more traditional pursuits like watching TV. In spite of that, 69% of 15-24 year olds still claim to watch TV (ie TV shows or movies on the TV set) on a weekly basis, compared to 74% of the population on average. But the term “watch” should probably be applied loosely: anecdotally it is clear more and more people are tapping away on PC keyboards or cellphones while the TV show runs on the big screen ten feet away.

    Client Reading:
    Social Media: Brits Lead in Social Network Usage

    Add to Technorati Favorites

    Posted by David Mercer @ 5:38 pm

  • 04Jun

    We have always cited the cable industry as the archetypal vertical or closed content-to-device business model. Ever since the US cable network providers (MSOs) began to offer paid-for services and secure content using set-top boxes, they have steadily increased their hold on the television content and device market. Initially with analogue premium TV boxes, and more recently with digital cable boxes, a growing proportion of US TV viewers use a device provided by their cable operator as the gateway to all their television programming. And as the cable industry has added more advanced features to those boxes, such as DVRs and VOD, these have also been controlled by the set-top box, leaving the “TV set” as essentially a dumb terminal.

    The satellite TV industry followed a similar model in both the US and Europe. Cable in Europe, however, has a somewhat different history, since its early development was encouraged by government subsidy in several countries. But the US model has also found its way into several European countries, notably the UK, and as digitisation of cable has accelerated, European cable operators have also moved increasingly towards a set-top box approach.

    Manufacturers of TVs have been concerned at these trends for many years, realising that the “intelligence” of their devices was being bypassed and ignored as many viewers used set-top boxes. In spite of many attempts over the years to encourage the integration of various cable or satellite technologies into TVs, such as digital tuners or smart card slots, these have largely failed. The challenges for TV manufacturers have been numerous, not least the additional cost of these features and overcoming the obsolescence argument, that viewers may want to change cable or satellite providers or services without having to change their TV set.

    There has also been an argument that it has not been in the strategic interests of cable or satellite providers to allow integration of what are essentially their network technologies into devices that are available in an open, horizontal market. Having fought hard to win new customers, service providers should not be inclined to make it easy for those customers to move to a different supplier, and forcing them to use a proprietary device is one way of discouraging churn.

    Recent developments suggest that the cable industry at least is now ready to adopt a much more open stance towards the CE industry. In the US, Sony has signed an important agreement with the five largest cable operators (Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Cox Communications, Charter Communications, Cablevision and Bright House Networks) to use Tru2way technology in its TV sets and other CE devices. This will allow cable customers to use cable services, such as VOD and interactive guides, on these devices without the need for a set-top box. Given the support for Tru2way by other major CE companies, there seems a genuine possibility that it will become widely deployed over the coming years, although the cable operators still have to demonstrate that they are wholeheartedly behind the initiative by actively promoting the technology.

    In Europe, meanwhile, some of the cable industry’s largest operators are also moving towards endorsement of a more open system. CE companies Sony, Panasonic, Samsung and Philips have led the initiative to develop a platform known as CI+ (Common Interface Plus). German cable operators, including the largest, Kabel Deutschland, have given their support, and others are expected to follow suit. CI+ will allow users to access premium and advanced cable services without the need for a set-top box. CI+ devices will incorporate a smart card slot which will accept conditional access modules provided by cable operators.

    So is this a sign that cable operators are accepting that the world is moving on? Or will both Tru2way and CI+ be sucked into the black hole of promising but failed open cable technology initiatives? My bet is that this time round things may really be changing. And the difference now is that cable recognises that its long-term future lies more in broadband than in the traditional pay television market.

    The TV set-top box has been the gateway to content for many years, but as people consumer more content on the web some of that role is increasingly shifting towards other devices such as broadband gateways, home PCs and TV sets. For sure, the set-top box is not going to disappear overnight. It will be some years before both Tru2way and CI+ are widely enough deployed to have a significant impact. And cable companies and content providers may still decide to promote set-top boxes if the new technologies fail to support future services or fail due to content security issues. But one way or another, the cable industry is getting ready for a major transition that will have widespread implications for device manufacturers and content owners alike.

    Client Reading:
    Global Broadband Forecast 2008 - 2012

    Add to Technorati Favorites

    Posted by David Mercer @ 12:58 pm

« Previous Entries   

Recent Comments

  • These guys claim to be able to deliver 3D movies on an XBOX ...
  • I think we more or less agree. As I said, these PCs will app...
  • I have to say I think you might be missing the point of thes...
  • The entertainment operating system (EOS) was an interesting ...
  • Very good summary of some key data !...