Wireless Smartphone Strategies

The industry’s most comprehensive set of critical market statistics and qualitative analysis, tracking and reporting on smartphones.

November 30, 2012 19:30 nmawston

According to our Wireless Smartphone Strategies (WSS) service, global smartphone industry revenues rose +38% annually during Q3 2012. Apple led the pack in the premium category of smartphones, while Samsung is forging a solid lead in the remaining segments, while narrowing the gap with Apple in premium tier. This published report, available to clients, provides quarterly global smartphone shipment, ASP, and wholesale revenue metrics for nine major vendors from Q1 2011 to Q3 2012. Global smartphone vendor marketshare by price-tier, and global revenue-share tracking by price-tier, for all nine vendors is also included.


September 5, 2012 18:56 srobinson

Nokia announced the imminent arrival of two new Lumia smartphones at it's New York event today. The Lumia 920 and Lumia 820 devices integrate many of the things that Nokia and Microsoft having been working on during the last 18 months, including Windows Phone 8 operating system, wireless charging, PureView imaging technology and software to deliver some cool camera effects.

In brief, the key hardware specs of the Lumia 920 are:

- DISPLAY: A 4.5-inch display with a capacitive "Super Sensitive Touch" touchscreen interface that can be operated with/without gloves (utilising Synaptic's ClearPad Series 3 technology). The display delivers "PureMotion HD+", which Nokia claims is the best smartphone display technology around, combining greater than 720HD resolution with a very fast refresh rate. It also includes sunlight readability sensors and smart polarisers that change the colours and tones of the display to make it readable in direct sunlight.

- CAMERA: An 8.7MP CMOS sensor with Carl Zeiss optics, combined with Nokia's PureView imaging technology that first appeared in the 41MP Nokia 808 device a few months ago. The Lumia 920 takes excellent photos and HD video even in poor lighting conditions thanks to two key innovations: firstly an aperture of f/2.0 which allows an enormous amount of light to be captured and allows the use of a large silicon sensor in a thin form factor; and secondly floating lens technology that provides image stabilisation and allows the shutter to stay open longer without creating blurred images. Nokia claims that the Lumia 920 captures 5 to 10 times the amount of light that other cameraphones capture. The key to the image stabilisation feature is tiny springs that are mounted on the whole camera module, not just on the lens.

- BATTERY: The Lumia 920 is powered by a massive (for Nokia) 2000 mAh Li-Ion battery, but the main innovation here is the integration of wireless charging using the Wireless Power Consortium's "Qi" standard. This is a big boost for Qi and the WPC as Nokia brings other partners to the market too, including Virgin Atlantic and the Coffee Bean and Tea Leaf, who will have charging stations in their business lounges and coffee tables respectively. This will hopefully propel Qi forward to create a single standard, increasing compatibility and reducing fragmentation in the wireless charging landscape.

- PROCESSOR: Qualcomm's 1.5GHz Dual-core Snapdragon S4 processor, MSM8960, is at the heart of the Lumia 920. It's a low-power, high-performance processor built on the leading-edge 28nm process node, delivering a stutter-free user experience and long(er) battery life. The modem in the MSM8960 supports 5 LTE bands and 4 HSPDA bands. Qualcomm's stranglehold on the Windows ecosystem is now in its third year of exclusivity.

- MEMORY: 32GB NAND Flash. Nothing sensational here and no memory card slot despite WP8 now supporting removable memory. Also, only one memory capacity option, unlike some of Nokia's competitors who offer higher memory capacity options for an extra $100, over 90% of which is pure profit. Has Nokia missed a trick here?

The Lumia 820 has some subtle differences:

- DISPLAY: 4.3 inch AMOLED display with 480x800 resolution, compared with the Lumia 920's 4.5-inch IPS-TFT with 720x1280 resolution.

- CAMERA: Same resolution 8MP main camera, but an aperture of f/2.2, compared with 8MP f/2.0 on the Lumia 920.

- BATTERY: A smaller 1650mAh battery. Still with wireless charging, this time in an exchangeable shell!

- PROCESSOR: Same.

- MEMORY: 8GB embedded NAND FLASH plus a microSDHC card slot supporting up to 32GB external memory, compared with the Lumia 920's 32GB and no slot.

The Lumia 920 is the culmination and integration of technology that has appeared in multiple Nokia devices recently. It takes the best of the Lumia 900's large display size, with the aesthetically pleasing curved display on the Lumia 800 and the incredible camera technology on the Symbian-based 808 PureView and mixes them up with some cutting-edge new image stabilisation camera technology, 4G LTE support, NFC, wireless charging and of course Windows Phone 8 .... Not bad Nokia!

Read the first impressions from our User Experience Practice of the Lumia 920's appeal to smartphone users here - Will Consumers Switch OS to get a Nokia Lumia Windows Phone 8?

- Stuart Robinson


June 19, 2012 19:21 David Kerr
 

Yesterday Microsoft held an event in Los Angeles where they announced the Surface, a self-branded tablet device that will be available in both ARM and x86 versions. The device features an impressive build quality in an attractive form factor as well as some interesting features. We believe the Surface will resonate well with the enterprise community and help Windows 8 OS garner interest, developer attention and market share.

Microsoft has learned well at the PR altar of Apple and executed perfectly at this ?secret? launch. Microsoft has not just imitated Apple but has potentially even outdone Apple in terms of attention to detail on the covers, keyboard, perimeter venting, digital ink and that?s all before you even talk about the device applications and features.

Given the anemic progress of Android vendors (Samsung aside) in tablets and the terrible historical track record of Microsoft?s Oems in tablets, introducing a competitive product which showcased the ability of Window to compete in the category really was in the critical path.

clip_image001

First impressions are of a device which has seen millions of man hours (ok maybe not quite that much) dedicated to not just designing a product but placing a market in the tablet market which has not but surely will cannibalize the PC market at some point.

Microsoft is smart to have showcased both the RT and Windows 8 Pro versions and to provide a roadmap and a challenge to its existing OEMs to match that!

clip_image002

 

An event that lived up to the hype and expectations, what a surprise. Well done Microsoft. The Surface announcement do not materially impact our forecasts for tablets by OS as this was already factored into our thinking.

Clients to our Tablet and Touch Screen Strategies service can read more about our take on the Surface tablets here


January 10, 2012 15:07 Alex Spektor

Yesterday’s Nokia announcement at CES of an AT&T-bound Lumia 900 Windows Phone with LTE represents a significant win for the device vendor, whose marketshare in the smartphone-hungry North American market, as illustrated here, has been on a steady decline for at least the past 4 years.

Together with the earlier-announced T-Mobile version of the Lumia 710, Nokia will now have at least two smartphones selling in the US that are not based on Symbian, a platform that had only niche appeal to US consumers and operators.

According to the Strategy Analytics Handset Country Share Tracker (HCST) service, T-Mobile was Nokia’s most important operator client for smartphones in the US in 2011, as the vendor’s business-centric Eseries devices are long gone from AT&T’s portfolio. So what is likely to happen with the arrival of the two new Lumia models?

At AT&T:

  • Time-to-market will be a critical factor for the Lumia 900. Rival HTC has also just announced its first LTE Windows Phone, the Titan II, which could steal some of Nokia’s thunder with an early arrival. Highlighting unique-to-Nokia capabilities like Drive navigation will be critical in attracting Windows Phone buyers.
  • The Lumia 900 alone will not instantly catapult Nokia into first, second, or even third place at the operator, and the vendor will be faced from heavy competition from Samsung and HTC, both of whom will be fighting for the #2 spot behind Apple.
  • RIM, with its below-average superphone portfolio, could be hurt the most here. If, indeed, there is only room for 3 competing platforms, then AT&T’s OS-diverse portfolio could squeeze the BlackBerry maker’s volumes in 2012.

At T-Mobile:

  • Following the recent arrival of the Sprint iPhone, T-Mobile has become the only major US operator without a strong third platform.
  • The low-priced (US$50 with contract) Lumia 710 will have a lot of appeal to cost-sensitive feature phone upgraders.
  • Nokia will not compete with pricy HSPA+ 4G superphones, but rather will take volume from more low-end devices from Samsung and LG, as well as T-Mobile’s own myTouch brand, as consumers look for a simpler alternative to Android.

Ultimately, the success of these two handsets depends largely on the level of promotional support given to them by the operators, especially in retail stores where a lot consumers make their decisions based on sales rep recommendations. Nokia has been working closely with both carriers on this dimension, winning critical drive slots and retail display real estate.

Finally, it is worth to note the significance of both the AT&T and the T-Mobile phone carrying the Lumia sub-brand, rather than their own re-branding. Globally recognizable, memorable sub-brands have been key parts of the strategy for the world’s leading smartphone vendors (e.g., Apple’s iPhone and Samsung’s Galaxy). In the operator-dominated US market shared brands are still a rarity, and we see this as a positive sign for Nokia’s long-term recovery.

Alex Spektor
Wireless Smartphone Strategies


January 3, 2012 10:55 sbicheno
 
A brief recap of what was a massive year for the smartphone industry.
 
January
As ever the technology year commenced with the big US tech show of the year: CES. The most positive publicity among the device-makers went to Motorola, which was the OEM lead partner for the tablet-specific new version of Android: 3.0 / Honeycomb. Moto combined Honeycomb with NVIDIA’s Tegra 2 dual-core SoC in the Xoom tablet; considered by many to be the device of the show. Moto doubled-down on Tegra 2 to also launch the Atrix smartphone in Vegas, which showcased an innovative laptop dock peripheral.
 
February
The biggest story of MWC 2011 in Barcelona broke just before the show, when Nokia announced its decision to use Microsoft’s Windows Phone as its main smartphone platform. The first NokiaSoft handset was still nine months away, but MWC 2011 did see the launch of the Samsung Galaxy S 2, which would go on to be one of the best-selling handsets of the year.
 
 
March
Another major theme from MWC 2011 was NFC, and in the following month there was widespread anticipation that Apple, RIM and Microsoft would follow Google’s lead in putting NFC at the core of their platforms. As the year progressed it became clear that NFC adoption was going to be a slow, gradual, process as a number of contactless payment initiatives struggled to gain traction.
 
April
April saw another round of major smartphone launches, including HTC’s media-centric flagship Sensation and Sony Ericsson’s phone / handheld gamer hybrid, the Xperia Play. These launches characterised a key trend established in 2011 – the need for Android OEMs to find ways of differentiating themselves from each other with additional features and services. The long-awaited white Apple iPhone 4 also finally made an appearance this month.
 
May
Mobile platform innovation was the focus for May. RIM announced the latest version of its platform – BlackBerry 7 – which included NFC support, while Microsoft unveiled the first major update to Windows Phone since its launch – codenamed Mango – which claimed over 500 new features, including deeper social networking integration.
 
June
Not to be out-done by its rivals, Apple previewed the latest version of its mobile platform – iOS 5 – this month. While there were many new features, including Newsstand and iMessage, but the headline launch was iCloud – Apple’s answer to cloud storage and music locker offerings from Google and Amazon. In June LG formally launched its main Android differentiation in the form of the Optimus 3D, with its auto-stereoscopic 3D display.
 
July
By the halfway stage it was becoming clear that two vendors were dominating smartphone sales in 2011: Apple and Samsung. In the second quarter both of them overtook Nokia in smartphone sales, with Apple number one for the first time. Meanwhile Samsung revealed that the Galaxy S 2 was its fastest-selling handset yet. There were also ominous signs for Nokia in the Chinese smartphone market, which had grown to be the world’s second-biggest behind the US.
 

 
August
August is traditionally one of the quietest months of the year for tech news, but that was far from the case in 2011. The big story of the month was Google’s bid to acquire Motorola. While this was positioned as a move to shore up the Android ecosystem with Moto’s patents and by giving Google more hardware expertise, it unsettled the other Android OEMs, which compete directly with Motorola. A possible consolation prize soon became available, however, when HP announced it was planning to sell webOS, while RIM announced its long-awaited BlackBerry 7 family of handsets too.
 
September
The big news in September concerned a tablet, but sent shockwaves across the whole mobile device industry. Amazon launched the Kindle Fire Android tablet at an ultra-aggressive price point of $199. This was immediately hailed as the first true competitor to Apple’s iPad, following the relative failure of tablet launches earlier in the year.
 
October
This was arguably the biggest handset launch month of the year. First we had the Apple iPhone 4S, launched later than new iPhones have traditionally been, and featuring the Siri voice recognition system. Then NokiaSoft revealed itself in the form of the Lumia family of handsets, which were launched alongside the biggest marketing effort yet for a Windows Phone handset. And lest we forget, October 2011 also marked the passing of Apple’s Steve Jobs.
 
November
Strategy Analytics revealed two key smartphone milestones to the world. At the start of the month we reported that Samsung had overtaken Apple to become the world’s number one smartphone vendor in Q3. A few weeks later we announced that China had overtaken the US to become the world’s largest smartphone market in that quarter too.
 
December
The early signs were that the 2011 holiday season produced record sales for many device makers, despite the spectre of another global recession in 2012. Amazon and Samsung both made announcements celebrating strong sales, while the Apple iPhone 4S was on a record trajectory as soon as it launched. It seems that, regardless of what’s happening elsewhere in the economy, the mobile device revolution is maintaining its momentum.
 

 


February 11, 2011 19:24 David Kerr

Today?s announcement of a long term strategic partnership between Nokia and Microsoft creates a third credible ecosystem for smartphones as an alternative to the Apple and Google models.

This is indeed a win, win, win. It?s a big win for Microsoft, Mobile Operators and Nokia, possibly in that order.

Microsoft WP7 which has finally got a vendor partner with scale and with geographic presence in hundreds of countries where it has weak or limited brand presence. Microsoft more broadly finds an ally in its battle to monetize web assets and compete more vigorously with arch rival Google. Microsoft critically gains access to Nokia?s navigation, location and services assets which will help them with local search, advertising and customization.

The strategic alliance is a win for Nokia who surpassed our and most analyst expectations with the depth and level of commitment to make Microsoft WP7 its primary smartphone platform.

A standard OS licensing agreement where Microsoft was added as an OS choice to help out with the American problem would have been nothing more than a token effort. Analysts, media and investors may well have dismissed a standard license agreement  as a half hearted effort as as the minimum required step leaving huge questions over how or when could Nokia build a modern scaleable OS to replace the fundamentally outdated Symbian.

Nokia has taken a very bold, ambitious step which signals that a) the PC business model with its associated outsourcing of R&D from vendors to Microsoft has arrived; b) represents a gamble that the need to combat the profit and revenue erosion from Apple?s vertically integrated model and Google?s Android will convince operators to actually range WP7 devices across their price tiers not just in the premium end and c) that Nokia has chosen to fight back by winning the rights to not just license WP7 but to shape its future evolution and win a basis for exclusivity and differentiation with core mapping and location assets.

The Microsoft/Nokia alliance potentially offers vendors an alternative to the inevitable but terrifying commoditization and flight of profits to Google in the fragmented Android ecosystem.

Beyond Nokia, if the ecosystem is successful in ramping up applications and compelling user experiences to compete with Apple and Google, the broader community of WP licensees will win due to the rising tide effect. The addressable market size for windows mobile devices will be dramatically increased as Nokia/Microsoft become the ?operator friendly? choice. 

Operators who have seen their lunch eaten by Apple and Google win by having two powerful brands with massive marketing and go to market muscle help develop multiple new products to appeal to customers across multiple price tiers rather than having to rely on low cost but weak user experience product from new Android vendors.

Perhaps the biggest win for operators though is that Nokia can concentrate on catching up on handset design form factors where it has been weak for a decade or more.

A rejuvenated Nokia launching new form factors on a competent mobile OS with its huge marketing muscle and customer appeal will give operators greater flexibility on subsidy budgets.

So its all win, win, win IF Nokia can get back to the business of icon designs delivered on time to meet key selling seasons. Some key questions remain that we will be addressing for clients in the coming weeks:

Can Nokia execute? How will other Microsoft licensees react to the most favored nation status given to Nokia? How much will this announcement and subsequent products help Nokia establish a significant presence and share of profit in the critical North America market? Can Nokia time the decline in Symbian revenues, profits and volumes with the ramp of WP7 products which will be available ?in volume? in 2012.

Oh and what about losers? Symbian developers? Google? HTC and early windows mobile licensees?

David Kerr


December 22, 2010 16:12 bjoy
Nokia has a healthy working relationship with Microsoft, and the partnership has been growing over the past few years. Recent initiatives include:
  • Microsoft Office Mobile Suite for Symbian.
  • Microsoft Sliverlight for Symbian.
  • The Nokia Booklet, a 3G netbook based on Windows 7.
On the organization front, Stephen Elop, a Microsoft veteran, took over the helms at Nokia earlier this year, bringing both companies closer than ever. While Sliverlight, Microsoft Office, and Windows 7 netbook initiatives are all signs of a healthy partnership, embracing the WP7 platform in its totality takes the relationship to the next level. Shifting the building blocks of your device/software/service ecosystem in favor of third parties is no small decision and will have effect on your intangible sub-brand assets such as Ovi. And that exactly is the rumor from this week, that Nokia will launch WP7 devices in 2011. While we have no official version of the story, it would be interesting to assess the impact of such a partnership in the market. On the positive side, Nokia’s industrial design, distribution and supply chain process are among the best in the industry. WP7 will gain a strong partner in Nokia to bring the best-in-class devices among Windows Phone series. But how much of an impact it will have on Nokia’s platform portfolio, positioning and regional priorities? Where WP7 sits in Nokia’s portfolio?                                        Given the base set of high-end hardware requirements for WP7, the Nokia WP7 device will be positioned in the same premium space occupied by the MeeGo platform. Will Nokia abandon the MeeGo platform in favor of WP7? Or are they going to co-exist, with WP7 focusing on the prosumer and business segments along the same lines of the S60 E-Series? Will there be any major shift in regional platform trends? USA: With an estimated 6% marketshare in 2010 (nearly all basic and featurephones), Nokia has been steadily losing marketshare and carrier shelf space in the US. The partnership is unlikely to change the competitive landscape in the US market, where Apple, HTC, Motorola and Samsung lead the operator shelves. WP7 LTE phones in H2 2011 / H1 2012 might be a potential option for Nokia to make inroads in the US. Western Europe: Microsoft will find more acceptance in carrier channels through Nokia in Western Europe. But beyond the “foot in the  door” strategy, the partnership will have to do little with the success of the platform. In emerging markets, where Nokia has the broadest reach in mid-tier smartphones, the WP7 will be not be the obvious choice for the cost sensitive segments. We believe Nokia will continue to rely on the S60 platform in the mid-tier smartphone segment. Overall, while the idea of a Nokia WP7 device looks like a big win for Microsoft, it’s unlikely to change the prospects of Nokia or WP7 in the smartphone department. Nevertheless, Nokia needs to raise its profile in the US, and this would be a step in the right direction, but it will need step-changes in distribution and subsidies. But for the most part, it’s going to be just another partnership for Microsoft and Nokia – you’re only as strong as your weakest link. - Bonny Joy

December 8, 2010 13:12 Alex Spektor
In recent years, the titans of the handset industry have been surprised by the success of newcomers. First, Apple – a computer vendor – shook up the smartphone market by storm, taking Nokia’s profit crown in the process. Then, Google – an advertising/search firm – brought to market a new mobile operating system, quickly overshadowing historic leaders RIM and Microsoft. Now, Google’s Android has also become the fastest-growing major smartphone platform, having shipped more than twice as many handsets in the first eight quarters.

Cumulative Shipments, First 8 Quarters

clip_image002

Google’s successful growth has been enabled by strong support from its many partner vendors. As the first Android handset maker, HTC long enjoyed top market share, steadily broadening its portfolio across protocols (including hot “4G” technologies like HSPA+ and WiMAX), global carriers, and retail price points, staying ahead of Android competitors Motorola and Samsung. Historically, Samsung’s smartphone share had been disproportionate to its successful position in the overall market, and we had long commented on the matter. However, starting in Q3 2010, Samsung became the world’s largest Android vendor. Samsung accomplished this by launching an all-out assault across the globe with its Galaxy S family of handsets. For example, in the fickle US market, where each carrier has demanding compliance and customization requirements, Samsung launched a Galaxy S phone with each major carrier. Samsung’s share of the global handset market has tripled since 2001, when it was already a third-ranked player. Given that historic show of determination, the vendor’s leap to first place in Android smartphones should not at all be surprising. Expect Samsung to expand this leadership position in 2011 and beyond, riding Android’s coattails to huge smartphone volumes. -Alex Spektor Samsung Overtakes HTC to Become World's Largest Android Vendor in Q3 2010 Global Smartphone OS Market Share by Region: Q3 2010

September 23, 2010 22:09 David Kerr

September 23, 2010

While there has understandably been a lot of attention given to consumer apps post iPhone and the plethora of application stores that have emerged, business mobility and enterprise mobility offer huge potential from horizontal to vertical applications and from smartphones to iPads and tablets to superphones.

In both NA and W. Europe, business customers account for under 30% of users but are the dominant streams of both revenue and profits for operators. On the device side, premium priced models from RIM, Nokia, and Microsoft Mobile licensees as well as the iPhone have long been key drivers of profits in a market where low single digit margins are the norm.  The explosion of smartphone choices has led to the battle ground moving beyond the corner office, to other executive and now increasingly the midlevel manager.

With a new range of devices competing for space in the corporate market, the issue of corporate versus individual liable has become an increasing priority for IT decision makers. Add on the complexity of managing an expanding list of OS (Android, iPhone, Windows Mobile, Symbian, Palm, MeeGo, Bada from Samsung) and the growing importance of mobile portable devices with access behind the firewall and one can already feel a corporate migraine forming…. And that’s before we even discuss device management, mobility policy, device retirement etc. etc.

I am looking forward to CTIA Fall (San Francisco October 5-7) and in particular to the Enterprise Mobility Boot Camp moderated by Philippe Winthrop of the Enterprise Mobility Foundation. The boot camp spread over two days will address many of the issue listed above with our own Andy Brown featured in an analyst roundtable on October 6th.  I look forward to meeting you there. Don’t hesitate to contact Philippe for passes to this the deep dive enterprise mobility event.

David Kerr

David Kerr
Snr. VP - Global Wireless Practice
Tel: +1 617 614 0720
Mob: +1 262 271 8974


September 10, 2010 20:09 bjoy
Android sales have already surpassed the iPhone and with each passing day, its building further momentum with new announcements and launches. The launch of the Huawei Ideos, a mid-tier (<200 USD) device with Android 2.2 is yet another milestone in the Android evolution as the platform now extends its reach to new segments traditionally occupied by the feature phones. Most, if not all, major operators have at least one Android model in the portfolio. The platform also has broad support from the vendor community, with major names under its banner. One question at the top of OEM and Operators is how my Android is different from your Android. Look at the Android portfolio in the US market. Aside from the glossy hardware specs and discounting the differences between the base version releases - Android 1.X/2.X – it’s hard to spot any differences beneath the skin. OEMs ability to differentiate is largely limited to the user interface layers. The HTC Sense UI, Samsung TouchWiz and Sony Ericsson Timescape are some of the leading Android skins available in the market. Under the hood, they all share the common goal of servicing the Google’s apps and service portfolio – Search,GMail, Maps and  Gtalk to name a few.   “True” Internet? An opportunity for differentiation here is to bring the “true” internet experience to consumers by seamlessly integrating services and features beyond Google products. This is a tall task for most OEMs as it’s not always easy to develop exclusive partnerships in the content or service space – and some of the most popular non-Google services like Facebook are already integrated to the core Android base anyways. But for operators, the stage is slightly different. Check out some of the most recent announcements from Verizon Wireless: •    The Verizon Samsung Fascinate, part of Samsung’s premium Galaxy S portfolio, uses Microsoft  Bing as the standard option for Maps. •    Bing will also serve as the default search engine for the device. The Galaxy S series is available under all major US operators, but except for the Verizon version, all bear the same look and feel. I’m not going to the merits of which search or maps service yield the best results, but the fact that operators are looking beyond Google’s umbrella services will provide more choice for the consumers – however small that segment be. Skype integration is another differentiator for Verizon Android devices.  Although the Android core base doesn’t have a Google branded VoIP service yet, sooner or later the Google branded VoIP service will be part of the core Android base – especially given the recent launch of integrated VoIP service with Gmail. Replacing core Google services with alternative services will not prove to be a winning formula in all instances, but it could bring the mobile Internet experience beyond Google’s umbrella brands and provide enough service attributes to differentiate from the Google’s core base. The service element is a critical element in the product planning process and product planners should pay keen attention before deciding what should or shouldn’t be replaced from the core platform.  At Strategy Analytics, we’ve tools to support our clients in positioning products with the right combination of hardware/platform/service elements. Drop us a note if you would like to know more on how we can assist your planning teams. - Bonny Joy