Wireless Operator Strategies

Wireless Operator Strategies provides both a deep and broad perspective of the operator market, combining granular operator-level and market-level data with ecosystem-wide understanding of wireless operator challenges and opportunities.

June 28, 2013 01:12 swelshdegrimaldo

Verizon stated this week that it is interested in entering the Canadian mobile market, and reportedly has made an offer for Wind Mobile (currently owned by Vimpelcom) and also approached Mobilicity.

Verizon sold off international assets after previous ventures, including divestiture of its interest in TELUS in Canada in late 2004 as part of a strategy to focus on its core wireless and broadband business in the US, so why now look at international again? With the US market maturing (although with continued growth potential), the timing may be ripe to revisit select opportunities in other markets, just as Softbank and others are looking at US investments to diversify.

Why Canada?

With a total of 27 million cellular subscriptions in the entire country at the end of 2012—less than a third of Verizon Wireless total subscribers—Canada would appear to offer only a small growth opportunity.

Yet Canada is attractive market for US carriers:

  • Relatively low mobile penetration for a developed market, with mobile Subscription Penetration by end 2013 under 82%, compared to nearly 116% in the US, as forecast by Strategy Analytics Wireless Operator Strategies service. In fact, mobile penetration in Canada is lower than in Mexico, which will reach just over 90% penetration in 2013 (see Worldwide Cellular User Forecasts, 2012-2017 )
  • High ARPU - Strategy Analytics Wireless Operator Strategies projects ARPU per subscription in Canada will be at US$56.45 compared to $45.61 in the US at the end of 2013.
  • Upcoming auctions for 700 MHz spectrum that may provide economies of scale and roaming with US carriers using 700 MHz bands for LTE, and provide opportunities for new competition with the leading three Canadian operators Bell, TELUS and Rogers
  • A market that is important for roaming to and from the US

 

With deadlines for applying to participate in the Canadian spectrum auctions looming in mid-September, Verizon and any other operators from the US or Europe eyeing the Canadian wireless challengers will have a busy summer working to clarify any acquisitions or investments.

Susan Welsh de Grimaldo, Wireless Operator Strategies


January 10, 2012 15:48 Phil Kendall

OnStar outlined the latest fruits of its collaboration with Verizon Wireless at CES this week. It’s showcasing a Chevrolet Volt research vehicle connected via VZW’s 4G LTE network to deliver a range of content and enhanced communications services – information services, streaming of multimedia content, video-calling, etc. VZW has been promoting LTE to the automotive industry as a way to future-proof their connectivity strategy and support tomorrow's high bandwidth use cases, and this message seems to be hitting home.

OnStar 4G LTE Research Vehicle 2012

The collaboration makes sense on a number of levels:

Firstly, LTE in general can offer a robust (and fast) enough connection to deliver these services in combination. Watching a YouTube video on its own is not a problem for many networks, but simultaneous sessions across the front and rear seat (video content and calling, online gaming, browsing, etc.) really do need to look at LTE as the starting point – a must-have rather than a nice-to-have.

Secondly, VZW’s network is built on 700MHz spectrum (as a starting point) so offers good geographical coverage. Mobile broadband networks have generally been about delivering massive capacity into urban environments. I visited Softbank’s new LTE network in Tokyo last week – built in 2.5GHz spectrum the cell sites were 50-200 meters apart in order to saturate the streets with high-speed signals, delivering 40-50Mbps to multiple devices in our demo bus. But that network won't extend beyond city limits and the automotive industry needs a high bandwidth network which can offer much wider coverage - the 700MHz LTE network is the only real option today.

Finally, LTE is a reality today in the US market and is here to stay. The US is significantly ahead of the rest of the world in building mobile broadband networks in the lower spectrum bands offering the coverage the automotive industry requires. VZW’s network now covers more than 200 million people in 190 markets (ok, I know I’ve just said there is more to this than urban coverage) and will cover its entire 3G footprint with 4G by the end of 2013. So the US automotive industry, more than any other, can develop LTE services now which will still be supported come the end of their product lifecycles.

The next challenge for the automotive industry will be data pricing. Bundling a year's service with new vehicles could get very expensive (for the OEM) very quickly with these multimedia applications, so new pricing models will be key. Our own survey work has shown that consumers would prefer a single shared data plan to connect their array of 3G/4G-enabled devices, rather than one plan per device. That is still very much a work in progress in the US market, but a necessary requirement if we are going to see the automotive and CE industries enjoy the full benefits of LTE.


December 29, 2011 03:26 suerudd

On December19th. AT&T - discouraged by massive DoJ and FCC opposition - ended its bid to add capacity with the acquisition of T-Mobile USA. This leaves AT&T hunting for alternative ways to acquire sufficient spectrum, even though it was finally able to complete the purchase of Qualcomm’s 700MHz Spectrum on December 27th.

But where does this leave T-Mobile USA?

On December 20th. Deutsche Telekom (DT) CEO Rene Obermann speaking to his own corporate blogger suggested that T-Mobile USA would need to move to LTE technology eventually; and would also require additional spectrum. He made clear however, that the $3 Billion cash settlement from AT&T would be used initially to reduce DT corporate debt not to further enhance T-Mobile USA’s network that was just upgraded in 2011 to dual carrier HSPA+ and is currently providing sufficient capacity for current customers.

Rumors of T-Mobile USA’s difficulties are exaggerated…

As of end of third quarter of 2011 T-Mobile USA served 33.7 million customers only slightly down from 33.8 million at the end of third quarter 2010. 10.1 million of those customers are now using 3G/4G smartphones up 40% from a year earlier. OIBDA margin was 31% in the third quarter of 2011, up from 28% in the third quarter of 2010 due largely to lower losses from equipment subsidies that were reduced by the launch of T-Mobile’s unlimited Value plans. These Value plans allow customers to subscribe to new services without an upfront payment for a bundled handset. These plans have reduced ‘costs per gross add’ and lowered the cost of subscriber retention.

Overall, T-Mobile USA had a slim but maintainable third quarter net income of $332 million on service revenues of $4.67 billion.

This year therefore, T-Mobile survived disruptions to its retail channels including the discontinued retail partnership with Radio Shack; handled the uncertainty of the AT&T acquisition; and held Contract Customer churn down to 2.4%, although Prepaid churn jumped to 7.2% from 6.6% between the second and third quarters.

T-Mobile is maintaining its customer base and making money.

Challenge is Migration to LTE

The challenge for T-Mobile USA is to fund future growth to compete with the three other large players in the US market – AT&T, Verizon and Sprint - as well as ‘no contract’ low cost prepaid regional operators - Leap Wireless, MetroPCS and US Cellular - all of whom are migrating to LTE.

In November T-Mobile announced that its nationwide ‘4G’ (HSPA+ at 21Mbps) network now covered 208 markets across the US reaching more than 200 million POPs.

But how will T-Mobile migrate this network and its GSM PCS customers to LTE without AT&T?

Possible Migration Path to LTE

We have reported that migration to at least a Hybrid HSPA+/LTE network is key to long term profitability. TMoNews the unofficial blog of T-Mobile USA recently described a possible low cost path for T-Mobile’s LTE migration. See: ‘Editorial: Why T-Mobile Should And Will Deploy LTE (The Technical Edition)

At this point in time, T-Mobile is just now refarming PCS spectrum. In a majority of the markets where T-Mobile has both PCS and AWS spectrum with no AWS used, it is quite likely that they will deploy HSPA+ only on PCS because most of the remaining markets only have 10MHz of AWS and 30MHz or more of PCS. AWS will likely be reserved for LTE in these areas.”

“In areas where they’ve got plenty of AWS spectrum and they’re using it for HSPA+, they’ll dedicate about 10MHz of PCS to GSM and 10MHz to HSPA+. If they have 20MHz of PCS or less in a market with lots of AWS, there will be no deployment of HSPA+ on the band, but there will be scaling back of GSM to 10MHz to prepare for LTE. T-Mobile will deploy LTE.”

 “T-Mobile USA has been preparing for LTE on their core network and backend infrastructure for over two years now. … T-Mobile USA has deployed all the necessary components to run IMS on their core network and (has) made a new Wi-Fi Calling solution that uses it. As far as we know, they are the first in the world to commercially deploy IMS for voice, SMS, MMS, and other circuit-switched services. It would be trivial for T-Mobile to change the client software to make it run over LTE or HSPA+. By preparing all the core network and backend infrastructure for LTE this far ahead, their nationwide LTE deployment costs will much lower.” 

Financing the Path to LTE

The key question is whether T-Mobile USA can finance this migration without bringing in new investors. Even if the migration could be done for as little as $6 Billion, additional spectrum will eventually be needed. DT is unlikely to provide that and is being very cautious because of concerns about European market growth and the financial risk of its 40% share of Greek telecom group OTE. DT is also planning to expand in several areas of its European business rather than in the US. 

Nor is DISH Network, who has offered to Partner With T-Mobile likely to be able to finance a T-Mobile upgrade as it focuses on its own rollout.

Meanwhile T-Mobile USA is pursuing business as usual adding ‘no contract’ plans to keep prepaid customers; and offering aggressively priced deals for the Holidays.

And Oh Yes - directly targeting AT&T and iphone4 in its Ads with its attractive T-Mobile girl – Carly Foulkes


December 14, 2011 06:06 suerudd

It has been a busy few weeks for AT&T.

Date

Event

Nov 25th/28th

  • AT&T-deep in talks with Leap Wireless, a second-tier but growing wireless player, to sell it a big piece of T-Mobile’s customer accounts and some of its wireless spectrum…..  AT&T hopes such a deal would placate the Justice Department …… or at least to strengthen AT&T’s hand if it goes to trial.

Nov.29th

Dec. 9th

  • US Department of Justice (DoJ) argued before U.S. District Judge Huvelle that since AT&T has pulled its merger application from the FCC, the issue is no longer pressing and there is no need to rush to trial. DoJ asked the judge to delay the trial to an unspecified date in the future.

Dec 12th

  • AT&T has until Jan 12th. to file a report with the court explaining whether it still plans to try to buy T-Mobile.
  • AT&T said that it is considering "whether and how" to proceed with the proposed merger, which needs both FCC and DoJ approval to move forward. If it presents a plan to proceed on Jan. 12th. the pre-trial process will restart on January 18th.

Dec.13th

  • U.S. District Court Judge Huvelle puts hold on Sprint, C Spire Suits and any court proceedings until Jan. 18, while AT&T weighs the future of the deal.

While many are saying the AT&T T-Mobile “deal is dead”, and AT&T has clearly irritated the FCC staff, AT&T is now finally taking a much more conciliatory attitude.

Our recent report ‘It's all about Spectrum - AT&T T-Mobile Bandwidth matched by Verizon and Sprint’ describes how Verizon and Sprint are both buying control of significant extra spectrum. However, the Verizon AWS spectrum purchase from SpectrumCo. requires FCC approval; and once it approves that deal the FCC will find it difficult to argue that a merged AT&T T-Mobile would have an excessively ‘dominant spectrum position’.

Once the FCC allows Verizon’s spectrum acquisition - and after Sprint’s takes ‘virtual control’ of Clearwire’s spectrum - AT&T will have a very strong case that its ability to compete will be diminished if it is not allowed to acquire T-Mobile.

A complete reversal of the original case.

AT&T is working hard to complete the deal and is thought to have two teams pursuing two parallel options.

Option 1. AT&T is negotiating to divest sufficient spectrum and assets to satisfy the regulators. See:

AT&T and T-Mobile: Will there be a Spectrum Fire Sale to Escape Department of Justice and Close the Deal?

See Blog: Could AT&T Settlement Catapult Leap and MetroPCS to Top National Status?

Option 2. AT&T is still preparing to fight in court.

  • Verizon’s recent actions may have significantly helped AT&T’s case.
  • If AT&T makes a new proposal on January 12th DoJ may demand that AT&T refile that proposal with FCC before it goes to trial. [Note: AT&T correctly noted that it is normal to resolve DoJ issues before getting FCC approval. We also noted that in April in: ‘AT&T T-Mobile Acquisition: How long will it take to close?’]

AT&T really…really….really… wants the T-Mobile spectrum for capacity growth and is not likely to give up easily.

But, if AT&T loses at trial there are two other likely options:

Option A. “A network-sharing deal between AT&T and T-Mobile could be established, but this would probably not allow AT&T to reuse T-Mobile's AWS spectrum for LTE. A major blow for AT&T.

Option B. Deutsche Telekom is still anxious to complete the sale as it has major European investment plans for the $39 Billion. It might decide to spin out T-Mobile to a Private Equity partnership pending a later sale to a new player like. Google. [Several options for T-Mobile’s future are summarized in AT&T and T-Mobile: Will there be a Spectrum Fire Sale to Escape Department of Justice and Close the Deal?

We should know by January 12th. 2012, if AT&T can come back with a modified proposal that may be acceptable to DoJ, and then the FCC.

Rethinking US Market Structure and Competition in an IP world.

In a recent policy paper Strategy Analytics suggested that the nature of US Mobile Broadband competition has changed and that ‘All-IP’ networks dramatically change both ‘economies of scope and scale’ and the ‘Relevant Geographic Areas’ that determine Competitive Concentration for Anti-Trust purposes.

See: Policy Insight: New Mobile Industry Structure and 'All-IP' Services change AT&T T-Mobile's 'Spectrum Dominance' and Create new 'Challengers'

There may not however, be sufficient time in the current AT&T case to make such a profound change to the traditional 1980s/90s market analysis. Nor to establish rules for the new digital ‘All-IP’ Mobile Broadband Industry.


May 3, 2011 20:14 suerudd

On April 27th.several competing operators - Cincinnati Bell Wireless, MetroPCS, NTELOS, the Rural Cellular Association (RCA), the Rural Telecommunications Group, and Sprint Nextel Corporation all requested the FCC to consolidate into a single proceeding the upcoming review of the T-Mobile acquisition (11-65) and the earlier Qualcomm MediaFLO Spectrum acquisition filing (11-18).

“In the proposed Qualcomm transaction, AT&T seeks to acquire Qualcomm's six Lower 700 MHz D Block (6 MHz) licenses, which collectively have a nationwide footprint, and five Lower 700 MHz E Block (6 MHz) licenses in five large markets. The T-Mobile transaction includes the acquisition of an additional 50 MHz on average in the same geographic areas covered by the proposed Qualcomm transaction. Obviously, with such an overlap, these two transactions should be examined together, rather than separately.”

In Appendix B. Competitor Chart of AT&T’s April 21st. Filing there are 567 pages of Competitor Charts for 700 MHz, Cellular, and SMR Licensees that show the Qualcomm D & E Block Spectrum alongside the AT&T Consolidated Spectrum. A Selected example for San Francisco, San Mateo and Washington DC is shown below.

As seen in the above example AT&T’s own Appendix B strongly supports the case for examining the joint impact of the two acquisitions.
AT&T may now regret not having waited to settle the Qualcomm acquisition before seeking to acquire T-Mobile. [Note: Appendix A shows the Spectrum to be consolidated between AT&T and T-Mobile.]

So now the FCC may need to review the competitive and market impact of AT&T's aggregation of spectrum in both proposed transactions on nationwide mobile telephony and broadband services.

AT&T may have trouble establishing that it really needs all the additional Spectrum.

RCA President and CEO Steven K. Berry has called AT&T’s acquisitions a ‘spectrum grab’ and said, “It is clear that AT&T is doing everything possible to gain market dominance by making not one but two major spectrum grabs in the proposed Qualcomm and T-Mobile transactions.”

AT&T is now getting increasingly unfavorable publicity – as Broadband DSL Reports notes “Press (Are) Not Buying AT&T Spectrum Claims”. The chart below is being used in multiple publications to exemplify AT&T’s overreach. It is easy visually to add together either the green 3G columns or the blue 4G columns to estimate the consolidated spectrum of AT&T and T-Mobile. It is apparent they both far outstrip Verizon.

Delay may cause problems for AT&T unless it divests properties rapidly.

The clock is running on the AT&T T-Mobile merger since the FCC established the Pleading Cycle for the AT&T T-Mobile Acquisition (WT Docket 11-65) as follows:

Filings                        Due

Petitions To Deny     May 31, 201

Oppositions                June 10, 2011

Replies                        June 20, 2011

 Despite this aggressive FCC timetable, it is increasingly likely that extensive negotiations will be required – both nationally and state by state. AT&T will probably have to divest sufficient properties to ensure competition in each market on a case by case basis to create even stronger competitors than shown on its website.

The agreement with Deutsche Telekom (DT) however, states that AT&T does not have to agree to divestitures and other regulatory conditions that would have an adverse effect greater than USD 7.8 Billion; only half of subscriber or spectrum sales value is counted towards that sum. AT&T has stated that it is prepared to divest up to 40 percent of the number of T-Mobile subscribers or approximately 13.149 million subscribers - based on the stated value of USD 578 per subscriber. But the likely buyers are AT&Ts competitors who have no incentive to move quickly or to pay full price .

But AT&T’s acquisition agreement with DT for T-Mobile USA has a ‘drop dead’ date of March 20, 2012 after which either AT&T or DT can chose to terminate the deal.

If the deal terminates because of a failure to obtain regulatory clearance there is a provision that A&T must pay DT up to USD3 Billion in cash; enter into a roaming agreement; and “transfer to Deutsche Telekom certain wireless AWS spectrum that [AT&T] does not need for its initial LTE roll-out.”

The growing opposition to AT&T may well push the deal to the fall of 2012 as we predicted in an earlier Insight AT&T T-Mobile Acquisition: How long will it take to close?


August 11, 2010 16:08 suerudd
August 11th 2010 Doing the FCC’s job? On Monday August 9th. Verizon and Google issued a joint ‘suggested policy framework for lawmakers’ which reads as if it had come from the FCC, leading to an appropriate response from FCC commissioner Michael J. Copps that it is “time to reassert (FCC’s) authority”. The framework endorses all the good ‘motherhood’ concepts - openness for legal content, nondiscrimination that does not block or degrade the Internet, and transparency for both wireline and wireless. And it addresses some of the traffic and network management concerns raised in my blog of May 27th . But the sting is in the tail. The fifth and sixth points posted in the expository blog carve out two major markets. The ‘Carve Out’.Two key markets are carved out for minimal FCC oversight and therefore would not be subject to many ‘net neutrality’ and access requirements. First area is ‘differentiated online services’ that integrate application services with bandwidth – “healthcare monitoring, the smart grid’ etc. i.e. vertical markets where performance and security must be guaranteed. The proposed Verizon and Google approach allows each application to be ‘nailed-up’ to a specific network - rather than the Virtual Private Networks VPNs) with Service Level Agreements(SLAs) that operate today. This could lead to significant innovation – if only it were not based on exclusive bi-lateral transport and applications vendor deals. Haven’t we been here before? Didn’t this lead to the original Enhanced vs. Basic Services split of Computer Enquiry II.  And it recreates the comparatively unsuccessful ‘Walled Garden’ approach to applications. Second ‘carve out’ is wireless broadband which is claimed to have “unique technical and operational characteristics” and to be “more competitive and changing rapidly”, so “in recognition of the still-nascent nature of the wireless broadband marketplace” Verizon and Google recommend against applying any of the “wireline principles” except transparency. Broadband is Broadband is Broadband….Although wireless has historically had special treatment, mobile broadband is rapidly reaching parity with wireline speeds and quality. Over the next two years applications will operate seamlessly across wireless and wireline networks and many users may not even be aware which network they are on. To users Broadband is Broadband. All applications require an appropriate class of service at a competitive price. Special value added networks and mobile broadband cannot and should not be carved out from the general area of FCC broadband service oversight. Reactions and Furor on both sides of the ‘pond’ In the US, Wall Street Journal welcomes this ‘Traffic Plan’ and TIA notes that the “Verizon and Google…rightly addressed important issues such as the need for network management welcoming it as a “step in the right direction … and a possible solution to the uncertainty created by the Comcast decision.” But bloggers and the New York Times Opinion page started discussing carrier/search engine business alliances and making jokes about ‘VerGoogle’ that have now prompted a strong tweet denial from Google “We've not had any convos with VZN about paying for carriage of our traffic. We remain committed to an open internet.” Wired magazine however, describes the ‘differentiated online services network’ as a “left-field proposal to anticipate an entirely new information highway for ‘fast lanes’” and believes that “Google and Verizon have proposed creating a second, paid-access-only internet” “over an unspecified global network”. Could that be Verizon’s new Packet Optical Transport Platform (P-OTP) network? Across the pond reactions are still evolving. Financial Times subtly points out that “industry insiders on Capitol Hill and at the FCC are questioning Google’s motives for an apparent about-face on its position as one of the most powerful advocates of net neutrality.” Others reflect the stronger view that the EU is taking on Net neutrality.with one blogger warning that “An obvious outcome … is that when Google is dragged backwards through an antitrust investigation by the EC or DoJ, it will find no favours from civil society after this betrayal…..Good luck, Google - you thought China was sticky in terms of political support, you'll find that was a storm in a delicate teacup.”

June 4, 2010 20:06 David Kerr
sa photo dk

 

 

 

The inevitable movement to tiered pricing which started with Verizon Wireless acknowledging its plans to do so for LTE and has been accelerated with the much anticipated data plan announcement by AT&T this week.  So, what next?

    • Will we see significant priced based competition for mobile data among the top US operators?
    • Will we see significant movement in share of adds for AT&T as iPhone wannabees are tempted by a plan of only $15?
    • What impact will lower data plans for smartphones have on AT&T’s Quick Messaging Devices and Verizon Wireless equivalent?
    • How long before we see family data plans and shared usage across multiple devices?

The move by AT&T is a smart play to extend the smartphone momentum as the low hanging fruit of Apple aficionados, multimedia techies and style seekers willing to pay top dollar has been significantly penetrated.

There is no doubt that the iPhone remains the coolest device on the marketplace and the end to end user experience remains easily the best in class. So, reducing the TCO to attract the next 20% of customers to a paid data plans while educating customers about data usage levels and managing the traffic risk is very smart business in my opinion.

The lower price points will help AT&T maintain its current leading share of smartphone users and may be attractive to casual social networkers

  • Although the 50 photos allowance is not exactly generous! For casual messenger, and social network status checking and moderate email the new DataPlus plan is quite attractive overall and will likely attract a portion of customers who would otherwise opt for a Quick Messaging Device from AT&T or a competitive offering from Verizon Wireless.

I do expect to see some modest price competition among the big operators

  • with T-Mobile most likely to drive prices lower given their need for scale and to protect their predominantly youth centric customer base. but also expect an increasingly strong Verizon Wireless handset line up to compete strongly.

The impact on Quick Messaging Devices is in my opinion likely to be modest

  • as a traditional qwerty remains overwhelmingly the input of choice for heavy messengers in the US although there is definitely room for lowering the $10 mandatory data plan on featurephones

Family data plans and data plans which allow access across multiple devices are in the pipeline

  • but will probably not make an appearance until 2012+ as part of LTE offerings.

From a device vendor perspective, the move to lower priced iPhone plans is likely to put further pressure on vendors like LG who have yet to make a credible offer in this space as well as RIM who will find more competition in the consumer space.

The lower pricing on data plans will be music to the ears of ambitious new entrants like Huawei, ZTE who plan to bring mass market priced devices to the US & Europe. The lower TCO of smartphones as a result of downward pressure on service prices boost their addressable market.


March 30, 2010 00:03 David Kerr

sa photo dk Returning from CTIA in Las Vegas last week and with only 2 days before going off on vacation to Florida, I found myself reflecting that two of the most interesting meetings I had at the show were with mobile operators.

During CTIA I spent some time with AT&T emerging devices and T-Mobile M2M teams and was impressed with how both these units had managed to cut (or at least untie) the cord to the mother ship and avoid having innovation stifled by the Borg up at Corporate.

    • AT&T’s efforts to encourage a broad range of new applications and devices has definitely paid dividends with Mr. Lurie and his team adding an impressive 1M users in Q409 as a result of new device categories (mostly PND and EBR).
    • T-Mobile revealed a somewhat unheralded pedigree in M2M.

Partnership is the order of the day.

AT&T highlighted partner applications ranging from location enabled pet collars (Apisphere) to glow cap bottles to aid compliance with medication schedules (Vitality) to a very cool new tablet from Openpeak which is very different to the announced but apparently supply side challenged iPad.  Verizon Wireless and Sprint are of course also praying at the alter of open development but perhaps with less public presence.

When I think of enterprise mobility, AT&T and Verizon Wireless are top of mind but T-Mobile has in fact quietly been developing strong competency in the M2M space over the last 7-8 years.

T-Mobile offers four different SIM form factors to suit specific applications and have enjoyed triple digit growth for the last four years. T-Mobile US has quietly activated “hundreds” of different device types on its network with only a handful of devices being rejected or pulled due to network unfriendly characteristics. These devices span Telematics, Connected Energy, Telemedicine and several other applications.

So what is the common DNA of two very different operators that has allowed them to innovate and focus on new opportunities? Separation and operational autonomy to facilitate and open funnel approach to partners and speed of execution not normally associated with US carriers.

In the case of AT&T, the Emerging Devices group was chartered with developing a new space and freed from the legacy of voice & data consumer tariffs and prepaid/postpaid categories which just don’t cut it in the new connected reality where users will have multiple devices connected but used in very different ways. Mr. Lurie and his team have been able to streamline device certification and experiment across the spectrum of business models for new connected applications.

For T-Mobile, speed of certification (days not months) and the independence of being a self-contained unit (own engineers, own sales although linked to broader enterprise group) reporting to Finance & Strategy have allowed them to pursue their “easiest to do business with” approach to the M2M markets.

So, the takeaway? Innovation is alive and well at US operators but separation from the collective corporate mind is essential.

David Kerr