CES Preview day was all about hardware, but day 1 was all about filling that hardware with new and innovative content.

1. Extending TV content to mobile devices. This is perhaps one of the most compelling trends expected to proliferate in 2011. Verizon and Time Warner shared the stage to discuss the evolution of TV Everywhere. Dish Network will further extend its Sling Media ability by allowing subscribers to access their live and recorded content on Android devices. The extension of pay TV content to the mobile device will surely complicate the mobile media market in the US by offering an already paid for alternative to mobile specific solutions such as Primetime2Go or even iTunes.

2. Mobile Media continues to grow up. First, Hulu Plus announced it would be available on Android devices soon. This brings Android on par with iPhone but the long lag between the Hulu Plus Beta launch in August and the eventual release of Hulu Plus on Android shows that content owners clearly see iPhone as the premier platform for now. Finding a way to fuse digital and physical, Ultraviolet continued to discuss its development in making accessing owned content more convenient through a digital locker and embedding the technology in as many devices as possible. For more information about Ultraviolet read my Fierce Wireless article. The goal of both services is to increase consumption and with ever larger screens on handsets and the tablet incursion of 2011 these services will find a waiting audience.

3. Video is key to 2011 and beyond. As LTE launches, new video services become available, and phones offering more multimedia-centric features 2011 is sure to be the year of mobile video. But video is about more than just professional content. It also encompasses video conferencing. Recognizing this opportunity, Skype acquired Qik, a provider of mobile video software and services that enable individuals to capture, instantly share and preserve great moments on video from anywhere. This will surely help Skype better compete with other video conferencing services.

What is evident from these announcements is that content owners see mobile as the next big opportunity as well as a necessary outlet for ecosystem building. How networks will handle the load associated with all this video remains to be seen as most popular applications today – broadly speaking – are light on network usage compared to video streaming apps. But its clear that 2011 will be the year of mobile video.

CES 2011 is nearly upon us and the conference will unveil to the public innovations that will shape the year. So, as press day hits its stride it's evident that there are a few key themes in mobile media we can expect throughout the conference and 2011. One key phrase to sum up the events thus far; thinner, faster (both device and network), and bigger (Which is not a contradiction with the first adjective). 1. 4G. One of the buzzwords that will be discussed throughout the show and has been said more times today than zealots at a Steve Jobs keynote say ooh and aah. 4G is clearly the future and for a multimedia loving public the ability to stream and download content more quickly will impact their device usage. 2. Thin. Depending on when a handset manufacturer announced their newest flagship handset today they were briefly the "thinnest smartphone on the planet." Peruse a few press releases and this key phrase will unabashedly appear at the top. 3. Fast. The 1.2GHz Qualcomm SnapDragon processor (and its competitors) and dual core variants will begin making their way into handsets this year. For content consumption this will inevitably mean richer applications, more immersive games, and of course HD video consumption/recording/editing. 4. Cross Platform. Whether it be a TV, a tablet, or a car cross platform services are quickly becoming the rage. As OpenFeint discussed at the AT&T developer conference this morning the ability to compete with friends across platform is the future. Also at the AT&T event discussions were had about developing apps for U-Verse that work on various tablets and phones. For users hoping to better immerse themselves in their content, apps, and games this cross platform functionality will change how they view the ecosystem of products they buy and allow for the creation of very compelling apps unlike anything we've seen so far. 5. Bigger. Screen sizes are growing ever larger (Samsung has a 4.5" device coming) and compatibility with third party accessories such as PC docks and HDTVs will turn phones into a hub for media consumption unlike ever before. For users uninterested in consuming content on a 3.5" screen the new options will make media consumption much more compelling and should impact the growth of digital content distribution as well. This is just the beginning of course and if you're interested in hearing more you can follow Strategy Analytics analysts by tracking the hastag #SACES on Twitter or view our intermittent live stream from CES at .

One message I've consistently been hearing from Nokia over the last two years has been that all of the different Ovi services will somehow combine together to make something wonderful that would "delight users" (their words). Nokia never gave any concrete examples, and I was starting to think that this was simply vaporware - but now that all the services are together and under the same Ovi banner, there is some magic starting to happen. The Nokia Gig Finder application genuinely impressed me at this year's Nokia World. The premise is simple - but then aren't all the best ideas? The Gig Finder app looks at the music you have on your phone, checks your location, and then suggests up-coming gigs for you. You can buy tickets directly, message your friends about it, save the gig on your calendar, get directions to the gig and listen to some more music from the artist to get you in the mood for the gig as well!. Music, Maps, Billing, Messaging, Social Networking and the phone's Calendar all coming together - which sounds like it should be far too complex for the user but in fact the app is remarkably simple and intuitive. All of the technical stuff is hidden and it is the complex integration of services at the back-end and the single sign-in (which has taken Nokia over a year to achieve across its Ovi suite) which makes this sort of stuff possible. An interesting, innovative, compelling, useful app which is greater than the sum of its parts - and with a developer community numbering over 3 million, I'm hoping to see more innovation like this emerging out of the Nokia ecosystem. As Thomas Edison said, "genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration". After the years of talk, they needed something to prove there can be an end product. I'm sure there has been plenty of perspiration behind the scenes at Nokia as they rolled out and integrated these services, at last that 1% inspiration is starting to show. Related reports: Nokia Opens Up To Innovation - David MacQueen

The great thing about sitting on an industry award judging panel is that now and again entrants provide data points or insights that we as analysts can use as assumptions or estimates. In this instance I was honoured to be sitting on the MEFFY judging panel for Technology Innovation, an award that was presented at the Meffys Gala Awards Ceremony on 21st June 2010. One entrant, a mobile ad company which shall not be named, provided stats about its interactive mobile video adverts, which made for interesting reading. Interactive video delivers the advert in a software player that can be customised and made interactive by the advertiser by adding menu options and links to websites or advertising micro portals. Client: Vehicle manufacturer Cost of campaign: €37,606 Number of impressions: 3,497,920 Click on the video: 55,735 (CTR 1.6%) Number of video advert views: 47,525 (eCPM €791) The first thing to note is that the effective CPM for interactive video, which is over €791 in this case, has some way to fall before we begin to see its widespread use and adoption by media brands. Our average CPM estimate for a mobile video ad (which is generated following discussions with mobile advertising companies) is around $7, significantly below the €791 premium for interactive video adverts. The second interesting point is that 15% of consumers that clicked to play the video advert did not watch it. We can speculate why these might be, (see below) but most of the likely problems could likely be solved if the advertising network worked alongside the operator for better device, network and user targeting: 1) The devices/lack of targeting: i.e. they didn't target the ad at people with video-capable devices, or they didn't create the video in all formats so it wouldn't play on some devices. Can operators can provide more detailed information about target handsets and restrict this failure rate? 2) The network: Failed download due to limited bandwidth or connectivity. Operators should be able to provide information to the service provider to adapt their video rate to the current capability of the network. 3) Users not on data plans: An operator could prevent the user running away screaming by zero-rating. While there is much innovation for advertising outside the carrier ecosystem, in my view operators can indeed play an important role in smoothing over any cracks and help enable a potentially lucrative mobile advertising industry for all parties. Nitesh Patel

 

May you live in interesting times as the old Chinese proverb goes. Well in the information, communication and entertainment industry we certainly do. Some very interesting questions face our industry whether we look at:

• the outcome of much delayed Indian 3G auction or
• the battlegrounds around HSPA+ and LTE or
• the surging Android ecosystem vs. weakening Symbian or
• the upside potential for WebOS under it new owners
• the potential disruption caused by mobile cloud phones and device

Every major technology advancement has lead to a massive disruption in the handset and infrastructure vendor community.

• In 3G, Motorola’s slim myopia led to its near ruin and has provided huge growth for Samsung and a foothold in international markets for LG and SEMC.
• On the infrastructure side 3G was expertly grasped by Huawei and ZTE leading to a new wave of M & A and a new world order which counts Nortel as a victim and seriously challenges ALU.

So how will the migration to 4G change the playing field?

• Who will benefit most on the operator/service provider side?
• Will Cloud Phones be disruptive in LTE?
• Will operators find a path to realign the traffic/revenue mix with mobile broadband devices?

I would welcome your thoughts on these key questions. Also don’t forget to join our client webinar on Thursday May 27.

 

David

When I saw last week’s latest NFC payments trial announcement by the GSMA, I have to confess my immediate thought was - So what? Another day, another contactless payment trial.

In 2006 I estimated that by 2011 mobile would facilitate $35 billion worth of contactless transactions, which has clearly been wildly off the mark! I hold my hand up and admit that I underestimated how slowly it would take to roll out mobile contactless payments. Despite this, it remains my opinion that handset based contactless payments will eventually support billions of transactions, driven mainly by strong convenience motives. Ever decided not to bother buying a snack or a magazine at a newsagent after seeing the length of the queue? Well, contactless payments should mean faster movement of queues; less waiting and greater likelihood you will complete your transaction. Importantly for businesses it will scale down cash handling costs. Yes, there are some competing contactless instruments, like contactless cards, but why bother thumbing through several cards in your wallet when you can just whip out your phone and be on your way?

The technology implementation of contactless payments on handsets has been agreed on by operators and device vendors through the GSMA Paybuy initiative. Furthermore, facilitating contactless payment is part of the strategy of leading payment companies (banks and credit cards) like MasterCard, and Barclays. So what’s preventing full deployments? Operators are waiting for the handsets from vendors. The handset vendors are waiting to see when retailers upgrade their terminals to accommodate contactless payments. Meanwhile, merchants won’t invest in contactless technology until they see evidence of wider deployments of contactless payment instruments, so we're in a deadlock situation. To their credit (pardon the pun) banks and major credit card companies are taking the lead by distributing and marketing contactless payment cards. Over time this will lead to growing adoption of contactless infrastructure among merchants and remove one of the barriers to take off.

However, critical business model issues still need to be resolved. Operators want compensation for subsidising these new payment instruments into the market and they are in a position of control because payment applications will reside on SIM cards issued by them. Within an established ecosystem for payment accommodating an extra few mouths to feed will remain a key challenge, and an area which we intend to investigate further in up coming reports on contactless payments later this year.

Nitesh Patel

Spiderman (née Peter Parker) and Harry Obsorne. Julius Caesar and Marcus Brutus. Apple and Google. Each of these great friendships inevitably turned into a rivalry. The battle for the consumer’s mobile soul became more complicated on January 20th as rumors abounded that further acrimony between Apple and Google, the former bunkmates, has led Apple to consider Microsoft’s Bing as the iPhone’s default search engine. Take a moment to let that sink in. Apple partnering with its rival Microsoft – certainly with noses tightly clenched - to challenge the enemy du jour, Google. The mobile market certainly makes for strange bedfellows. Beyond just posturing, the possibility of Bing coming to the iPhone shows Apple is serious about its divorce from Google but it could just be an interim step for greater Apple control of its platforms. 1. Google Services. A number of iPhone users – unwilling to pay the annual fee for MobileMe use Google services, particularly Google Sync to keep e-mail, contacts, and calendars always up to date from iPhone to cloud to computer. If Apple is serious about limiting Google’s footprint they should make MobileMe free and hasten the conversion of Google users to MobileMe users. Failure to do so, combined with the possibility of greater disconnection from Google services could convince some Google users to adopt Android. But a free MobileMe not only prevents this, it gets users further invested in the Apple ecosystem. 2. Apple Control. Maps. Search. The processor. Streaming music. Apple still partners with a number of companies for its device and service, but it has also been on an acquisition binge. Could this be the beginning of greater control for Apple to ensure a wholly differentiated experience? Acquisitions of PA Semi, Lala, PlaceBase, and Quattro certainly indicate it more Apple control could be the future. Could an Apple search engine even be on the horizon? 3. The Tablet and other platforms. All service/OS providers want greater control over the user experience. Google is releasing an entire OS, Chrome, to extend its control to more platforms. Apple will not want to cede valuable property on iPhone, iPod Touch, or the iPad/iTablet/iSlate/iTenInchOLEDTouchscreenMacBookTouchPro. Looking at the broader picture – offering improved embedded services such as Maps while also allowing users to download other best of breed applications will ensure an improved, but differentiated experience. It seems therefore that partnering with Bing could be an interim step, another defensive move to relinquish any lingering grip Google has on the ‘out of the box’ Apple platform and eventually lead to a more wholly Apple experience and an improvement to the Apple ecosystem. But if Apple doubles down with its own services it must remember an important lesson Spiderman was once taught before he could defeat Harry Osborne’s Green Goblin – with great power comes great responsibility. -Josh Martin

Afte the inevitable wave of irrational exuberance has come the equally inevitable correction and flow of negative comments regarding Google Nexus One.

• We are now seeing a huge rebound of criticisms about customer service, implementation and execution, moaning and complaining for existing t-mobile customers who have to pay more than a new customer to get a cool device and strong complaints from developers about availability of SDK and support.
•  Naturally, the questions about Google's ability to execute on direct sales are being raised but these shall pass very quickly in our view.

Within our wireless team we had divergent opinions from network centric, application focussed and device driven analysts but ultimatlely we arrived at the following key perspectives:

• Consensus is that Nexus will be successful by high end tier Smartphone levels (single digit volumes in 2010 but upside potential when it rolls out beyond TMO in US and to more open markets in Europe). Nexus is likely to sell more through operator channels than direct overall. Handset volume though is not the metric by which Google will measure Nexus success nor should operators as Nexus sales are a means to an end.  If Google is successful and Nexus ends up driving usage and value for operators, they will support it with subsidies.  Otherwise, operators can passively watch Google evolve its own-branded offering with little to lose. Tier One handset vendors (SAM, LG) may have the most to lose as Google’s marketing muscle and brand coupled with compelling devices and experiences will be a strong competitor for Operator slots, subsidy dollars.

• Handset revenues and profits are a nice to have for Google. Key to their success and long term ambition is too boost the mobile browsing ecosystem. More open devices capable of browsing/search/maps from Google or others is positive for Google.  Google needed to update and get close to parity in terms of an engaging, fun, easy browsing UI with competitive links to key apps like maps, media etc and this device achieves that goal. Google is great at creating a buzz and the media is ready to talk about something other than Apple.

• Google Nexus and indeed the whole Android approach is not about controlling/owning the user (contrast this with Apple). Google’s key metric is advertising revenue. Google's vision is well publicized: the browser is how they will deliver services, even on mobile, and apps are a stop-gap measure as far as Google's strategic vision is concerned. Google is banking on HTML 5 as their solution to fragmentation but we believe they are drinking too much of their own coolaid here and underestimating the importance of apps. Google’s key goal is to increase eyeballs and advertising.

• Some key elements that have not been addressed which we believe are key in Google’s future evolution and will be key to watch relate to Voice and what Google does its Gizmo5 acquisition to push Google Voice into a full VoIP proposition. This is where Telcos should be most worried and where we have yet to see all the pieces positioned on the battlefiled.

 

As we rapidly close the cover on one of the toughest years the telecommunications, content and internet industries have ever seen, SA takes a look ahead beyond the recession to detail the key megatrends for the mobile industry in 2010.

We see a tough but positive mobile ecosystem outlook with devices recovering stronger than services. More consolidation is likely among network operators, while profits for device vendors will continue to flow away from handset only vendors in favor of device/services integration specialists. Emerging markets will continue to dominate volume with strong 3G rollout competition expected. The global market for services, applications, devices and infrastructure will post modest growth of approximately 3% in 2010.

The total mobile industry revenue including services, infrastructure and devices was flat in 2009. We expect a modest growth of 2.8% in 2010 to $1140B.

· In 2009, only strong growth in data spends by users ensured that total industry revenues did not decline. Data revenues grew 9.5% in 2009 and are expected to grow at a 13% rate in 2010 reaching over $200B.

· Handset market sell through revenue will rebound well in 2010, posting growth of 4% while the infrastructure market will continue to struggle and will decline slightly.

Key issues shaping the 2010 landscape include:

• Operators needing to balance the the strong rise in Capex requirements driven by the data traffic explosion against slow revenue growth. The likely outcome being significant M&A, network sharing and even applications development.
• Handset OEMs will be forced will put the early stake in the ground for new device categories. Traditional OEMS will continue to struggle to match the Apple & Google vertical integration strategy which has proven so successful.
• As the big five vendors focus on smart phones and content/services in the open markets, a race develops to get services/apps onto feature phone products or other operator customized devices
• On-portal traffic continues to grow but is outpaced by off portal session growth. Contextualization and personalization of the user experience will determine winners and losers.
• The rapid diffusion of Flash and HTML 5 on handsets could negate much of the need for mediacos to use open platforms/app stores in mature markets.
• In the business sector we see SMEs and Manage Mobility as key battlegrounds. We see growth in hosted services for SMEs (e.g. Unified Communications infrastructure-one phone mobile and fixed, one voicemail etc.  Personal v corporate liable devices (iPhone v BlackBerry) becomes a major issue.
• In the Emerging Markets area we see consolidation & 3G expansion in urban areas as key battlegrounds. With improved financing prospects, there will be significant consolidation among regional operators and rationalization of holdings.