January 8, 2011 15:01 dmercer
A CEA Board member told me at a Thursday evening party that the body behind the International CES was thinking visitor numbers this year might be heading towards 170,000. Many regular visitors I’ve spoken to agree it has been busier at the Las Vegas Convention Center than they can ever imagine, even in the last peak year, 2008. And in spite of the increase in hotel capacity since then the story is that there are no rooms to be had at the inn. Rumours even abound of visitors having to sleep on the streets or wander the casinos all night without getting any sleep. OK, that last bit was made up, but it may not be far from the truth, perhaps through personal preference in a few oddball cases.  There’s a fine balance between creating the enviable perception of a “can’t miss” event and making the experience unbearable for everyone tempted by the hype. And from a personal perspective and an informal survey of passing name badges and cab and monorail lines, CES 2011 certainly seems to have attracted many folks for the first time. Many press events have been so busy that even pre-registrants have been turned away; as an example, the Samsung press conference was beyond a joke, with never-ending lines of people still waiting to enter the event after the doors had to be closed.   With all respect to some of the international press, I’m not sure that a correspondent from “Land Rover Monthly” should be getting the same priority and attention as those of us who live and breathe the “consumer electronics” industry 24/365. But then, the CEA’s job is to grow “its industry”, and if Land Rover buyers can now be classified as consumer electronics customers, all well and good. With the content and media industry here in force, as well as all manner of telecoms and cable service providers, alongside the traditional target audience (consumer electronics retailers), it would seem the CES’s “industry” has suddenly expanded beyond all recognition.  Don’t get me wrong: there has been a buzz about this event which has been missing the last few years, and we at Strategy Analytics have certainly had an excellent few days of meetings. But the longer in tooth amongst us will recall the Comdex saga of some years ago, when a leading international technology trade show collapsed under its own excessive weight. How much bigger can CES get before the same happens here? The LVCC will certainly not cope with many more people in January 2012, so something will have to be done about show floor capacity if it moves towards 200,000 visitors. A return to split Sands/LVCC show floors perhaps?  David Mercer

October 13, 2010 17:10 dmercer
I was speaking on the panel at the OTT 'mashup' eventat Ogilvy's London Docklands headquarters last night, alongside Turner Broadcasting's Casey Harwood and Anthony Rose, CTO at the BBC's Canvas (now YouView) project, amongst others. As a first-time masher-up and intrigued at the possibilities for the format, the event turned out to be organised along relatively familiar panel debate lines. Casey and I began with introductory comments, and were followed by critiques from the other contributors. The session was then opened up to debate, including audience questions. All the time, running on a display behind us, was a Twitter feed of comments from participants in the twittersphere, as well, presumably, as a few of the 100 or so people who joined us in the traditional, physical fashion. The only problem was that the panelists had to turn away from the audience to see if any particularly fascinating Tweets had appeared, and if they ever did, it was noticeable that the physical audience's attention would be diverted to the ominous gap between the panelists and away from the speakers. The one recommendation I would make is that questions and comments from the virtual audience could have been added to the debate; it did rather feel at times as though we were being Tweeted at without right of reply. Nevertheless it was an interesting evening and I hope the audience found the debate valuable. my own contribution centered on a few relevant datapoints from our recent survey of UK TV and online TV viewers. In particular I referenced the fact that 13% of UK people are currently watching TV on the internet at least on a weekly basis. So we needed to bear in mind that the OTT phenomenon is still restricted to a relatively small proportion of the population, and most of that activity is taking place on the PC. The number of people accessing web TV on their TV set is of course even smaller: 6% of people are connecting a PC to a TV, and 4% now claim to use a dedicated internet TV device. Having said that, our work with early connected TV adopters within our Digital Home Observatory suggests that television behaviour can change rapidly once viewers have access to some of these emerging technologies. This segment is motivated by a desire for greater viewing flexibility and access to preferred content. They also still see weaknesses in current connected TV solutions, especially in the field of control devices and interfaces. The panel also touched on the issue of business models, and in response to the question of how things might look in three years I replied that the basic alternatives would not change greatly: television in the UK will still be funded by a combination of public service licence fees, advertising and customer payment of one sort or another. The mix may change slightly, and we may see greater variety in pay business models. But it’s important to remember that customers are very sensitive to their monthly bills. The impression is often given, especially by new entrants, that new payment models can somehow overcome consumer resistance to the size of the overall television bill. The reality is that 80% of UK customers check their bank statements every month, and a similar proportion prefer predictability in their monthly payments. 69% would agree to pay only for the shows they watch, but only if it reduced the overall monthly bill. All in all I agreed with Anthony Rose’s comment that too little emphasis in connected TV discussions has been put on live, scheduled television. The assumption seems to be that this traditional model will break down rapidly as various on-demand options become available, but this trend is likely to happen only slowly over a long period of time. Even for early adopters, scheduled broadcasting remains an important part of the overall mix. The overall message is one of increased fragmentation of delivery models and audiences. Client Reading: Profiling the Connected Media Consumer - UK Add to Technorati Favorites

October 6, 2010 17:10 bpiper

Cisco today unveiled its long-awaited consumer Telepresence product. A smaller and scaled-down version of the company’s enterprise-grade TelePresence system, “ūmi” (‘you-me’) comes with an HD camera, a console and a remote. The idea of the videophone is far from new. Children of the 60s and 70s may recall George Jetson getting chewed out by his boss, Mr. Spacely, over videochat. In fact, the technology, is older than that, and was conceptualized as early as the late 1800s. The German Bundespost offered (albeit short-lived) commercially-available service the1930’s. AT&T announced its Picturephone product at the 1964 World’s Fair, though the service never quite took off, reportedly maxing out at 500 subscribers nationwide.

This time it’s different…

What makes this time different? According to Cisco’s VP of Consumer Marketing, Ken Wirt, three things are different this time. The quality and ubiquity of HD displays, the increased average household bandwidth, and exponentially increasing processing power have converged to create a ‘perfect storm’ for telepresence.

With apologies to Elvis Costello

Writing about telepresence is like dancing about architecture

Or was that Frank Zappa? In any case, as with HD or 3D, trying to explain telepresence to someone who hasn’t seen it is akin to trying to explain the color blue to a blindfolded person. You kind of have to see it to understand it. I had a chance to test drive the product last week before the official product announcement, and must say that—even as a professional skeptic--I left the demo thoroughly impressed. The so-called “immersive” effect (allowing you to ‘see what others are feeling’ ) is quite noticeable, and is what distinguishes it from a garden-variety Skype video or web-based video chat program. There is near perfect synchronization between audio/video, and people appear life sized on the screen. Ken Wirt cited a study showing that 55% of all conversation is non-verbal. It’s no surprise that it is our body language, the nods and raised eyebrows, shaking heads, smiles and smirks, that distinguish a phone call from a ‘carbon-based’ face-to-face meeting.

The Uncomfortable Topic of Money

The price tag is steep, at $599 for the unit, plus a monthly fee of $24.99 for unlimited ūmi calls, video messaging and video storage. The system will be sold through Best Buy/Magnolia Home Theater stores, bestbuy.com and on the cisco website. The service requires a minimum of 3.5 Mbps to work in 1080p, though it can be optimized for use at lower speeds, as low as 1.5Mbps for 720p. This means that the service will largely be limited to those with cable broadband or FTTx. Cisco believes that 34% of US households have this type of upstream capability—which is in line with Strategy Analytics’ own estimates.

The Network Effect

Back in the early days, the phone company sold “telephone pairs,” with the understanding that the value of the network lies in the number of nodes. A telephone network with one phone is not terribly valuable. Nor is a telepresence unit if there’s nobody on the other end. Cisco has partially circumvented this problem by providing interoperability with Google video chat, though if you’re spending $600 on a unit, you probably want the “real thing.” The real value of telepresence will be realized when there is a robust network of equipped households. While family video-calling seems the most obvious use-case, its utility seems rather limited. How many times do we really want to videochat with Grandma each month? Unless and until the network reaches critical mass, the appeal and draw of video calling will be very limited. Rather than a consumer mass market play, the real opportunity might very well be in the Business to Consumer (B2C) space. If private industry can help subsidize and drive the technology more mainstream, it could hit the critical mass it needs. Cisco talked about a number of other potential applications, three sound like potential winners in driving telepresence forward. These include

Financial Services: A $600 upfront investment and $25/month is a drop in the bucket for a company trying to prove its value to high net worth clients. For the cost of a few steak dinners, a Financial Services company could equip a client’s living room and increase the frequency of “touch points.”
Health Care: While the chatter around Telemedicine never seems to cease, this is one application where it actually could make sense. An insurance company might find it financially beneficial to subsidize a unit for a patient requiring regular and routine examinations, or for medical compliance monitoring (“Did you take your pills Mrs. Smith?”)
Distance Learning: How about tapping into the multi-billion dollar distance learning market in the US.  Equip every “Phoenix” with a system? That’s what I call scale.

I want one… but not for $599 plus $24.99/month

Many who experience the technology firsthand will want one for their own living room. It’s cool. It works well, and the potential applications are only limited by the imagination. It’s light years ahead of pc-based chat. On the flipside, the price is high. Too high. And when you add on the 24.99/month fee, it starts to feel like another cable bill. Survey research conducted by Strategy Analytics in Q3’10 shows that 30% of Americans showed some interest in a service of this type. Importantly, though, 46% of those interested said they are often concerned about their ability to afford regular household bills, 45% said they worried about signing up to new fixed term contracts when buying new products and services. TELEPRESENCE_INTEREST

Adoption Will be Slow But Steady

Cisco would certainly admit that the $599 price point is untenable for the long run, and as volumes slowly ramp up, we should expect to see price points come down. If Cisco is successful in getting private industry into the game, and a subsidy model takes hold, we could see adoption speed up. The other barrier standing in the way of rapid adoption is broadband. While today only one-third of households have the minimum required bandwidth to support the system, this will certainly increase going forward. We estimate that by 2015, over 60% of all US households will have at least 1.5 Mbps upstream capabilities. Stay tuned…we’ll be putting out a Telepresence report in the upcoming


January 6, 2010 07:01 dmercer
The depth of the recession in the US consumer electronics market was highlighted today by CEA data which confirmed a decline in dollar revenues in 2009 of 12%. The outlook for 2010 improves but only in the sense that the rate of decline falls to 3%. In the meantime we're hearing news of new 3D TV channels already, with both ESPN and Discovery throwing their hats into the ring. This is great, if expected, news for the many 3D-ready TVs we expect to see over the next few days. At this evening's CES Unveiled event Sensio were showing their passive 3DTV, even though the company today announced its partnership with Visio to launch an active 3DTV later this year. Mitsubishi was also showing its laser 3DTV with the adaptor which will be necessary for compatibility with Blu-ray 3D players when they are lauinched. Logitech was showing its new Lapdesk N700, a laptop “cushion” with in-built speakers designed for enhanced laptop usage in the comfort of the armchair. The peripheral retails at $89.99 and also features an in-built cooling fan to prevent over-hearing, a familiar problem for those many TV viewers who now sit with a laptop on their knees. Logitech have thoughtfully added a grip to help keep the laptop steady, but unfortunately in my case it failed to prevent the Macpro falling to the floor. No damage done, luckily, but perhaps evidence of a need for further improvement in design. Logitech was also demonstrating the fruits of its recently closed acquisition of Lifesize Communications, a videoconferencing specialist. On display was its Passport set-top videoconferencing device. This retails at $2500 and allows anyone with a minimum 2-way 1Mbps broadband connection to communicate using HD video (720p). The service downscales to lower resolutions for slower bandwidth connections. Logitech claims that this device is a third of the price of any other similar product on the market. That may be true today but is unlikely to remain so for much longer. Videoconferencing and telepresence are shaping up to be one of the emerging trends of this CES and we will hear a lot more over the next few days, in addition to the Skype/Panasonic/LG announcement today. Yet another OTT video set-top box was being demonstrated by Syabas with its Popbox product. This grew out of the company’s Popcorn Hour device. The Popbox has been designed to be especially user-friendly, and the user interface does appear attractive and accessible. The service integrates currently 20 “content application channels”, which means things like Netflix, and is working with 200 application developers. It will launch in March 2010 and retail at $129, plus $20 for the optional WiFi module. The Popbox is 1080p-capable, although the only 1080p content was demonstration material. If Syabas manages to sign 1080p deals with content providers it will certainly be a step ahead of most competitors. ProVision CEO Steve Cliffe was confident enough in his company’s wireless HD technology to carry a laptop across the show floor while it streamed 1080i HD content, and there was no loss or deterioration in signal. This UK firm was founded by professors at Bristol University, and uses proprietary error correction and RF management techniques to improve HD video streaming over 802.11n. The company is talking to set-top box and TV manufacturers looking to support HD distribution to multiple home devices. Another UK firm, Imagination Technologies, was launching its Pure digital radio products for the US market. Pure is the leader in the UK but virtually unknown overseas. It will, rightly, tread carefully as it enters the notoriously challenging US market, and will obviously (since the standard is not used) drop DAB from its US product line-up, instead concentrating purely (sorry) on internet radio. Its Sensia product is the highlight of the range and features a full-colour touch screen LCD display as well as additional interactive capabilities like Twitter and Facebook. Pure confirmed to us that video-capable devices are a natural step forward and can be expected in the next year or so. Client Reading: HDTV: Standards Muddle Clouds Outlook For Wireless Displays Add to Technorati Favorites

October 19, 2009 21:10 dmercer
The UK’s 1.3m Sky TV subscribers who own Xbox 360s are about to get a real treat. Instead of putting up with Sky’s archaic EPG they will soon be surfing Sky’s content using the slick Xbox Live interface. We were given a live demonstration of the service today and everything (well, almost everything) is looking good for the commercial rollout on October 27th. Let’s get the slight caveat out of the way first of all: today’s demonstration from a central London location used a broadband connection to the production servers which will support the commercial service rollout. However, during live IP “broadcasts” one of Sky’s sports channels the picture was not 100% reliable, and occasional freezing and jerkiness was noticeable on several occasions. This would not perhaps be significant on a normal streamed video service to a PC, but it seems doubtful if TV viewers will be quite so forgiving. I’m sure Xbox and Sky will ensure that the commercial service is not plagued by these slight problems. Sky’s Griff Parry, who heads the Sky Player group, and Microsoft’s Jerry Johnson, head of Xbox Live in Europe, offered a united front to the partnership, claiming that, after initial and understandable caution, both teams had worked together extremely well and with considerable mutual respect. Of course we have seen previous apparently rosy partnerships involving Xbox fail to deliver, but this is clearly different. Sky would not be putting its substantial reputation for quality and reliability on the line if it was not convinced that the Xbox Live platform was robust, and the evidence so far (subject to the earlier qualification) is looking extremely promising. As expected the Sky programming sits behind one of the Xbox Live menu items in the Video Marketplace tab. As soon as the Sky option is selected the background and colour scheme become blue, reflecting Sky’s corporate image. The Sky menu items closely reflect the standard Sky TV EPG, down to channel and genre options. For relevant options there is the choice to watch on demand or live. In my view the biggest benefit of Sky on Xbox will be for Sky Movies subscribers to have access to a considerable library of true VOD movies on their TV set. Sky believes there are two major opportunities from this initiative: first, to secure loyalty from existing customers; and second, to tap into a lucrative 20-30 demographic for which its traditional satellite-based distribution may not be appropriate. Sky is thinking here particularly of young males who have yet to “put down roots”, who may move home frequently, and who inhabit apartments where satellite dishes are prohibited. This segment is seen as prime Xbox owning territory and therefore ripe for upgrade to premium TV services. Besides increasing the overall customer base, the Xbox Live platform offers Sky a new avenue towards advanced services. The early example of avatars sitting in front of a big home cinema screen watching live football together may or may not prove to be a gimmick. But a real opportunity for Sky certainly lies around integrating communications and content into exciting new services. Parry admitted that he sees headset-based voice chat during programmes as one of the most compelling opportunities in the early days of the Xbox Live venture. We can only imagine the possibilities as Xbox continues to add peripherals such as the set-top camera/microphone – the crowd noise during live sports could soon become the sound of a million home-based viewers shouting at the TV screen . Given what has been possible before, it would seem that Sky and Xbox together really can take the TV experience to a completely new level. If anything disrupts progress it will be corporate disagreements, rather than technology failings. Twitter: twitter.com/DavidMercer_SA Client Reading: Online Video: YouTube vs. Hulu - Let the Battle Commence! Add to Technorati Favorites

October 1, 2009 16:10 dmercer
At this week’s Ceatec event in Tokyo Sony will introduce a prototype single-lens 3D professional video camera, the first of its kind. The technology operates at a frame rate of 240fps which offers, according to Sony, the smoothest possible motion even with fast-moving sports footage. Our previous posts have identified one of the key challenges of 3D TV and video, namely adapting the production material to the ocular peculiarities of different viewers. When zooming and focusing using the current two-lens approach, human eyes are particularly sensitive to any discrepancies between the two images in quality, vertical alignment or other parameters. Complex processing is required to minimise these problems, and Sony claims that its system removes the need for such procedures. Sony’s prototype system allows incoming light to be separated into left and right images, which are then processed separately. Sony claims that, because the two images are captured at precisely the same time, 3D images are “natural and smooth” and can cope with rapid movement. Whether two- or single-lens, the need for improved 3D camera technologies is clear, so Sony should be applauded for taking 3D another step towards the mass market. Whether this innovation solves the problems it claims to, without introducing others, will only become apparent as it reaches commercial status. We fully expect other professional video firms to be working fervently on their own solutions and look forward to commercial implementations over the coming months. Twitter: twitter.com/DavidMercer_SA Client Reading: Digital Media Devices Global Market Report Add to Technorati Favorites

September 23, 2009 17:09 dmercer
We have had a number of discussions with ActiveVideo Networks recently, before and during IBC. ActiveVideo offers network-based processing to bring rich media, ie interactive TV, to consumer devices over MPEG streams using the internet. The only requirement in the end user device is a software module, and a high speed internet connection. Naturally enough the IBC discussions focused on issues relating to managed service providers and operators, which is a key customer base at IBC. On its IBC stand ActiveVideo was demonstrating a proof of concept for delivering IP video streams to a CI+ module connected to a Sony flat panel TV. Neotion, one of the firms behind CI+, and Ziggo, the Dutch cable operator, were partners in the demonstration. ActiveVideo’s current customers include PCCW in Hong Kong and Time Warner’s Oceanic cable network in Hawaii. Other customers are expected to be announced in the coming months. But ActiveVideo’s recently announced partnership with Videon Central to target connected CE devices confirms that the company is also positioning itself for online video services which bypass managed service providers. The Videon deal plans for availability of connected TVs and Blu-ray players by the end of 2010. ActiveVideo’s IBC demonstrations were certainly impressive, and unlike many were running off a live internet connection. President and CEO Jeff Miller told us that ActiveVideo technology allowed cable and IPTV operators “to move at the speed of the internet, not the speed of TV”. A TV-like service over IP could be upgraded and added to very quickly, and once the RSS feeds were established the service could run with minimal intervention. ActiveVideo is certainly planning for a world where higher broadband speeds are the norm. The company claims that movies need between 3 and 5Mbps, while a multi-window video mosaic could require 10Mbps. These speeds are slowly becoming more widely available but are by no means universal in the US and Europe. I can’t help thinking ActiveVideo’s cloud video model sounds like something Cisco should be doing in order to fill some of the gaps in its consumer video portfolio. In fact, ActiveVideo’s vision statement – “we put the application and video processing load in the network” – could come straight from a Cisco strategy piece. I’ll just add in the observations that: Cisco is intending to make acquisitions; has the budget available; is targeting consumer and video as strategic priorities; is only a 10 minute drive away from the ActiveVideo offices; and that ActiveVideo has around 100 people – John Chambers’ ideal acquisition profile; and leave it at that. Twitter: twitter.com/DavidMercer_SA Client Reading: Digital Media Devices Global Market Report Add to Technorati Favorites

July 14, 2009 16:07 dmercer
I won’t read too much coincidence into two recent events: 1. the news today that Microsoft is planning a rival music streaming service to Spotify on the Xbox 360 and 2. my recent breakfast discussion with Don Mattrick, Microsoft’s SVP and global head of the Interactive Entertainment Business (ie Xbox). Two weeks ago, Don had clearly not heard of Spotify when I mentioned it to him. I hope he managed to get to try out the service while he was over in Europe. According to Peter Bale, executive producer of MSN, as reported in today’s Daily Telegraph Microsoft is planning a music streaming service under its MSN umbrella, which “will be a similar principle to Spotify”, and could also make it available through the Xbox360. According to the article Microsoft’s service is due to launch by the end of this month, ie within the next couple of weeks. There are a few oddities in this report. If, as reported, Microsoft is planning to launch the service so soon, it seems unlikely that it is still working out business models, as suggested. Secondly, the company has already announced a partnership with Last FM on the Xbox360 in the US, with the service to be launched later this year. So it’s no secret that Microsoft wants to get into the music streaming business. I have no doubt Microsoft will add music streaming to the Xbox360 in Europe before long. But I suspect the decision has not yet been taken whether to use the new MSN service or to partner with other providers, or, indeed, both. But even when that decision is taken, it will take time before it's ready for rollout to the console. But Microsoft’s strategy is for the Xbox360 to become an all-round home entertainment hub, and music clearly has to be part of the mix. Spotify runs a great service, but if those two can’t do a deal, I’m sure someone else will. Twitter: twitter.com/DavidMercer_SA Client Reading: Global Digital Media Growth Slows to 2.7% in Q4 2008 Add to Technorati Favorites

April 21, 2009 01:04 dmercer
Most of the discussion and presentations on the question of 3DTV here at NAB seem to start with the assumption that the vast majority of consumers will prefer 3D to 2D, but that’s not clear to me from some of the data presented. CEA research of US viewers presented by David Wertheimer, CEO of the Entertainment Technology Center at USC, suggests that, of people who have seen a 3D movie at the cinema, only 38% say they prefer 3D to 2D of the same presentation. In other words, nearly two thirds of people who have seen 3D are neutral or actually prefer 2D. The impact on home viewing is even less marked: Of 3D movie cinema viewers, only 1 in 5 say they want to watch 3D at home. Much of this may have to do with the fact that consumers simply see the theatre/cinema experience as completely different from anything they watch on TV at home, or that they see movies as different to much of the content they would normally see at home, such as documentaries, news or sports. Once they see those in 3D as well, the interest levels in home 3D viewing may rise. But it doesn’t seem to me like a very good start for 3D at home. As I reported recently, my own anecdotal evidence suggests that people can easily be nonplussed by the 3D cinema experience. NAB conference attendees who applaud clever creative and technical cinematic presentations are not typical of the wider public. I’m sure home 3D television and movies will come one day, and some consumers will be prepared to spend money on it. But apart from the user experience challenges, there are serious business model hurdles to overcome. Don’t be fooled by the fact that 3D theatre presentations may be outgunning the equivalent 2D shows at the box office. Theatre/cinema receipts alone are nowhere near enough for the studios to recoup their investments. Until there is a viable home 3D delivery channel the 3D movie explosion we are currently seeing is simply a loss-leader for Hollywood studios hoping to recoup those investments over the much longer term. Add to Technorati Favorites Buzz up!vote now submit to reddit

March 23, 2009 18:03 dmercer
I just came off a call with Bob McIntyre, CTO of Cisco’s Service Provider Video Technology Group (formerly Scientific Atlanta). Bob was introducing Cisco’s approach to media networks (medianets) for cable providers. What disturbed me was McIntyre’s reference to the BBC’s iPlayer, as implemented on Virgin Media’s UK cable network, as an example of successful hybrid network DVR/VOD solutions. Not that the iPlayer has not been successful, which of course it has. But McIntyre seems to have misunderstood some of the fundamental dynamics of media business models in the UK market, because he suggested that the BBC “gets the benefit of advertising” by making seven days of its programmes available on demand. This is clearly some way off the mark: within the UK, the BBC is not permitted to run advertising alongside its TV programmes. Which begs the question: what actually is the answer to the question McIntyre was trying to address, namely, what is the motivation for programme owners and broadcasters to make their content available on demand? The answer, in the BBC’s case, is that it is obliged to make its programmes available across multiple platforms and multiple models, because of its responsibilities as the UK’s leading public service broadcaster. It has no commercial interest in doing this, beyond increasing eyeballs, but that doesn’t directly affect its core revenue base, the television licence fee, which is mandated by the UK government. With all respect to the great technology firms, such as Scientific Atlanta, which have helped to create the cable industry, it never ceases to amaze me how the economics of broadcasting in the UK and Europe are misunderstood by US observers. They frequently cite the BBC’s activities of evidence of market success. Please, please, please remember: the BBC does lots of wonderful things, but many would not survive in a purely commercial market environment. (But I still think iPlayer is fantastic.) Twitter: twitter.com/DavidMercer_SA Client Reading: Digital Media Predictions for 2009 Add to Technorati Favorites submit to reddit