Connected Home Devices

No other vendor offers the combination of timely, consistent and accurate tracking of 22 different product categories spanning audio, video and computing,

March 28, 2008 22:03 dmercer
In contrast to my assertion that interactive TV was struggling, video search engine Blinkx claims that we are now a nation of interactive TV users. And although Blinkx doesn't repeat the phrase, the same could presumably be said of the US, where it carried out similar research and found, guess what, very similar results: in the UK, nearly 70% of online adults go online while watching TV; in the US the figure is even higher - 78%. Now this is clearly not the same version of interactive TV that "interactive TV" companies like OpenTV and NDS like to talk about, or that telcos and cable companies hope will add value to their digital TV services. The two-screen version, however, is certainly successful anecdotally, and this research gives some idea of the scale of media multitasking across the population. Anyone with kids knows they just can't sit watching TV any more - would that life were so simple! If a wireless laptop is available they'll have that in front of them, and a mobile phone and games console nearby at the same time. It's a phenomenon that applies increasingly to all age groups, and it represents another of the many concerns facing the traditional television industry as it struggles to keep its viewers focused on the big screen. Blinkx's research is a valuable input, but we should put the findings in some context. The survey looked at online users only, who are certainly in a majority in both the US and the UK, but 25% of households in the US and 36% in the UK are still not connected to the Internet (but presumably do, at least the vast majority, watch TV). So the survey numbers should be re-based to account for this. There is also the issue of frequency. By my calculations based on the Blinkx survey results I estimate that around 25% of all TV viewers in the US are regularly surfing the net while watching TV, and 20% in the UK. And of most concern to the TV industry is the finding that very few two-screen viewers are using their PC in a way that's related to what's on TV. 19% of US respondents and only 15% in the UK are actually searching for content related to what's on the big screen. So what are they doing? Again, the usual suspects: - checking email (58% UK, 53% US) - surfing the web for content that is not related to what they are watching (37% UK, 32% US) - paying bills (26% UK, 22% US) - interacting with others (24% UK, 18% US) - shopping (32% UK, 17% US). So putting it all together, it seems that around one in five or six TV viewers on both sides of the Atlantic are in fact being at least partially lost to the TV industry (and its advertisers) because much of their attention is on other web-based activities which are not related to the TV programme, even though the TV is switched on. TV broadcasters recognise this implicitly by the fact that they are putting so much energy into finding ways of reaching web users, but the scale of the impact is perhaps not yet fully appreciated. Of course, the question of attentiveness and how consumers absorb information and messages from different media is too complex for any online survey to investigate fully. TV viewers have always been tempted by distractions of one form or other, and the web is just one of the latest alternatives. Client Reading: Digital Disruption: Imminent and Long Term Threats to the Audiovisual Industry Add to Technorati Favorites

November 22, 2007 11:11 dmercer
Or at least, boxes that are provided, ie "managed" by traditional TV companies like cable, satellite and IPTV service providers. The rumours are rife that Google is planning an Android for the TV space, and should be no surprise since Vincent Dureau joined the company a couple of years ago, having been CTO at OpenTV, the interactive TV market leader. He isn't there to improve search, that's for sure... What commentators such as Techcrunch are missing is the critical distinction between a TV service delivered, managed and controlled by a set-top box as part of a vertical platform, and TV that is available through open systems. I'm sure Google can come up with plenty of cool interactive TV apps, but that is neither here nor there if the vertical service provider doesn't see them as a profit generator for themselves, not Google. Google's models, for the moment, depend on open technology frameworks, not getting into bed with vertical service providers. So the company should focus its TV efforts on pairing up with emerging web TV players like Akamai and Move Networks, which are forging a path towards Round the Back delivery of HDTV over the internet. It should also work with manufacturers of "Digital media devices" as its route the end user, ie TV plug-ins that get the web video straight to the big screen where people want to see it. What web TV lacks right now is a sound business model, and that may be where Google's advertising savvy comes in rather handy. Client Reading: Digital Disruption: Imminent and Long Term Threats to the Audiovisual Industry Online HD: Disney's ABC Throws Down Gauntlet To Competitors, and Access Providers Add to Technorati Favorites

September 11, 2007 17:09 dmercer
OpenTV's Matthew Huntington gave us an update on the company's progress at IBC. Matthew and I both go back to the early days of interactive TV, so there was some fond reminiscing of those heady times when it looked, if only for a fleeting moment, like the TV set might become a real rival to the PC in online services. Yes, people really did used to think we would be buying our weekly shopping, checking our bank accounts and sending email on the family TV set. And for a short time a few brave souls probably tried it a few times, using Sky's Open.... service. I vaguely recall managing to send a couple of emails using the remote control, which is scarcely believable in today's broadband world, never mind using dial-up. OpenTV benefited hugely from being the early leader in interactive TV, and in spite of more interactive TV misses than hits, has maintained its lead ever since. Now the company is looking to the next generation of interactive TV interfaces that will be possible on more powerful set-top boxes from 2009 onwards. Here is a (not very good) photo of what we might be seeing on our TV screens in a few years' time. 070920070062.jpg OpenTV is taking a refreshing user-centric approach to next-gen design challenges and evidently taking an innovative approach to how users will want to navigate a world of almost unlimited content from multiple sources: the wheel text input application seemed particularly useful. The company recognises that search and recommendation will be major challenges in the content environment and will need strong partners in this field, but it appears to be moving in the right direction. Patents have been filed in areas such as multi-faceted navigation. Home shopping, fortunately, did not feature prominently in the demonstration. Add to Technorati Favorites