Connected Home Devices

No other vendor offers the combination of timely, consistent and accurate tracking of 22 different product categories spanning audio, video and computing,

September 29, 2010 17:09 dmercer
Lack of ambition would presumably not be the most obvious failing of a new company which styles itself under the label “Everything Everywhere” (EE for sake of brevity). The name was chosen to represent the combined UK operations of both Orange (France Telecom) and T-Mobile (Deutsche Telekom), which now form a 50-50 joint venture and which announced their first results at an investors meeting in London yesterday. It would be a tad unfair, given the company’s core network technology assets, to assume that EE would be branching out into home pizza delivery any time soon, even though casual observers might assume “everything everywhere” might encompass all manner of exciting goods and services. Nevertheless, it was perhaps a little disappointing to discover from EE’s tagline – “Creating a new mobile champion” - that the network will apparently only serve network-based communications and applications to customers who happen to be moving around at any given time. Taglines are tough to get right, of course, and inevitably cannot please everyone. As the management presentations progressed, it became clear that mobility was not after all an absolute requirement for any future products and services which EE may choose to emphasise. Indeed, although they remain well hidden beneath the inevitable deluge of mobile phone and wireless network-centric commentary, fixed broadband and IPTV (for big screens) are very much alive and kicking as key elements in EE’s strategy. Executives even went as far as to designate IPTV as a “key part of a converged play” and that fixed broadband was “strategically hugely important”. This should come as a relief, perhaps even a surprise, given that fixed networks have played no part in T-Mobile’s UK business to date, and have been losing money (£80m in 2009) from the few customers Orange alone had managed to acquire. Given this performance the new venture might have been forgiven for abandoning fixed network businesses altogether as a lost cause. Instead we were assured that Orange’s broadband profitability was “already improving”, and that the recently announced deal to outsource network, IT and customer service to BT will have the desired impact of returning “Home” EBITDA to positive territory by 2012. Specifically EE will increase targeting of home broadband to its existing Orange mobile customers initially, and also introduce it to T-Home customers during 2011. Marketing will also encourage take-up of fixed voice by Orange and T-Home customers, since EE claims that the BT deal means that acquiring fixed voice customers would no longer have a negative margin impact on overall performance as was previously the case. The company is planning for 80% of new broadband customers to include fixed voice as part of their package. Potentially even more significant will be EE’s plans for IPTV, once they are finally confirmed. The company announced that it is looking at IPTV opportunities, including Canvas, the BBC-led over-the-top initiative. It would not join Canvas as a shareholder, but is considering affiliate membership. Whatever decision is eventually made on IPTV, EE will not become a major content player, which will come as a relief to shareholders and a disappointment to content rights holders looking for new competitors in the distribution market in order to boost values. EE even has the UK’s long-awaited fibre rollout on its radar. Its agreement with BT allows for access to the new fiber network by EE, although no specific plans have been agreed. Other emerging opportunities on EE’s radar include M2M (machine-to-machine), in which the company includes connected home devices and home automation as specific “high growth” verticals. M2M is a broad concept which may certainly one day lead to services and applications which approach “everything everywhere” capability. In the meantime, EE has probably has enough on its plate just to meet its growth and profitability targets in its core mobile and broadband businesses. Client Reading: Global Broadband Forecast 1H2010 Add to Technorati Favorites

September 12, 2008 20:09 dmercer
Following on from my previous discussion of Blu-ray quality broadcasting claims, here is a further sign that confusion reigns when it comes to discussing what is and what isn't "Full HD" video. On September 1st Motorola issued a press release about a deal to provide Deutsche Telekom (T-Home) with IPTV set-top boxes which included the following statement: "Within the scope of the contract, Motorola will provide T-Home with its VIP1616E set-top -- known to T-Home customers as Media Receiver 300 Typ A. With the device, subscribers to T-Home's Entertain service will be able to view premium sporting content in full HD." Now my ears are obviously attuned, given the attention the Blu-ray/DirecTV/Dish saga has attracted, to any mention of the phrase "Full HD". I was particularly impressed with the suggestion that sports content would be available in 1080p, since I know of no regular capture of live sporting events in this format. With less than 2% of European homes watching (720p/1080i) HDTV today, the industry desperately needs to make its message clear. And major TV manufacturers like Samsung are using terms like "Full HD" to market the 1080p-capability of their large screen TVs. So what are consumers supposed to make of suggestions that Deutsche Telekom is now offering sports content in "full HD"? I would not blame them for thinking that football matches would be available in 1080p, and it has taken a week for Motorola to confirm to me that this is indeed not the case. The company admits that it was wrong in using the words "full HD", and its press release has now been amended. I don't believe Motorola was trying to mislead anyone. What is concerning is that this market-leading technology provider can use terms which can be so easily misinterpreted, and is apparently unaware of the confusion that surrounds HDTV marketing. Motorola’s service provider partners will not find it easy to upsell their subscribers to HDTV services unless they and their technology partners can show consistency in communicating exactly what it is television viewers are supposed to be getting from HDTV. Visit us at IBC: Web TV and Virtual Worlds Analyst Presentations Add to Technorati Favorites

September 8, 2007 15:09 dmercer
We met today with Gerhard Bickmann, CFO of German cable operator, Kabel BW, who spoke at NDS's annual IBC press lunch. In a one-to-one discussion, Herr Bickman shared with us his views on digital TV and platform competition in Germany. In contrast to KDG, Germany's largest cable company, KBW is not planning to enforce a customer migration to digital TV, as it would lose too much money on subsidising or giving boxes away for free. Instead it is awaiting some clear decision from the German government that Germany should complete the switchover to digital by a certain date. This would make it clear to consumers that analogue switch-off was coming, and they would be more inclined to consider migrating to digital cable. Herr Bickmann's frustration with German policy-making was evident, given that other countries in Europe (Finland and Luxembourg) have made clear their intentions that all cable networks should become 100% digital. He seemed if anything, and perhaps surprisingly, less concerned with the threat of competition from Deutsche Telekom. DT's rollout of VDSL is not considered to be a major challenge as the availability of the highest speeds will be very limited. KBW is confident that it will trump DT's offer with universally available 100Mbps broadband once it begins to roll out Docsis 3.0 technology next year. Add to Technorati Favorites